Skip to main content

All Questions

8 votes
0 answers
503 views

Condensed categories vs categories (co)tensored with condensed sets

I am not sure how to solve set-theoretic issues properly, so let me first ignore them. There are two notions, probably closely related: Condensed categories, i.e. condensed objects in the category of ...
Z. M's user avatar
  • 2,446
12 votes
1 answer
371 views

What is the right notion of a functor from an internal topological category to a topologically enriched category?

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category internal to (some convenient model for) topological spaces (which I will denote by $\mathsf{Top}$). In the question Greg Arone asks: What is the correct notion of a ...
Niall Taggart's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
130 views

Universal property of the V-Mat construction

Internal categories and enriched categories can both be realised as monads in certain bicategories. If $\mathcal E$ is a category with pullbacks, then a monad in $\mathbf{Span}(\mathcal E)$ is a ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 9,521
18 votes
2 answers
914 views

Relationship between enriched, internal, and fibered categories

In this question, let $(\mathcal{V}, \otimes, [-,-], e)$ be a nice enough symmetric monoidal closed bicomplete category. The usual set-based Category theory has been generalized in many directions, ...
Ivan Di Liberti's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
112 views

Pushforward of an internal category along a functor

Let $F:C\to D$ be a “nice” functor (for example, $H_*(-;\mathbb{Z}):\mathbf{Top}\to \mathbf{Ab}^{\mathbb{Z}}$). Now assume that we have a category $O$ internal to $C$. Is there a canonical way to ...
FKranhold's user avatar
  • 1,623