Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
137 views

Question about a proof that any well-ordered set is isomorphic to a unique ordinal

I am studying a proof that every well-ordered set is isomorphic to a unique ordinal. However, I don't understand why $A = pred(\omega)$ (see yellow). One direction is clear: Let $x \in pred(\omega)$, ...
DerivativesGuy's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
184 views

CH, countable additivity, and Ulam's Theorem

I am seriously struggling in properly getting various steps in the proof of Theorem 1.12.40 (Ulam's Theorem) in Bogachev's first volume on measure theory which concerns the classical statement that ...
Kolmin's user avatar
  • 4,113
4 votes
1 answer
295 views

Analyzing the proof of Kirszbraun's theorem

Kirszbraun's theorem 1934 Let $A \subset \mathbb{R}^n$. If $f \colon A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^m$ is a $L$-Lipschitz function, then there exists an extension $F \colon \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{...
Curious's user avatar
  • 541
0 votes
1 answer
198 views

Prove without the well ordering principle that no m exists such that $n < m < n + 1$ for positive integers $m$ and $n$. [duplicate]

I'm trying to prove without the well ordering principle that no integer $m$ exists such that $n < m < n + 1$ for positive integers $m$ and $n$. I know there's a proof here that uses the well ...
jsmith's user avatar
  • 383
3 votes
1 answer
2k views

Every metric space is paracompact (an elegant proof)

I'm studying a different proof to show that each metric space is paracompact in the book: Singh, Tej Bahadur-Introduction to Topology. It is a very elegant construction unlike the inductive method ...
Inquirer's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
145 views

Well Ordering implies Induction Proof doubt

I’m trying to understand the proof for the fact that that the Principle of Well-Ordering implies the Principle of Mathematical Induction; that is, if S ⊂ N such that 1 ∈ S and n + 1 ∈ S whenever n ∈ S,...
Math55's user avatar
  • 143
0 votes
0 answers
286 views

Well Ordering Principle proof for amount of postage

I have encountered this task for WOP practicing and struggle with forming set of counterexamples and moving on from there. (a) Prove using the Well Ordering Principle that, using $6¢$, $14¢$, and $21¢...
Twinkle_Monkey's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
29 views

Proof of "For each integer m, the set S = {i ∈ Z : i ≥ m} is well-ordered." [duplicate]

This is question 6.17 from Mathematical Proofs by Chartrand/Polimeni/Zhang. Prove: For each integer $m$, the set $S = \{i ∈ Z : i ≥ m\}$ is well-ordered. The given proof in the back of the book ...
chrisT's user avatar
  • 85
2 votes
2 answers
150 views

Well-Ordering Proof in Cunningham

In Cunningham's Proof [1] of the Well-Ordering Principle (assuming $\textsf{AC}$), he begins by considering the set $\mathcal{W} = \{ \preceq | \preceq \text{a well-ordering on a subset of } A \}$ ...
Luke Poeppel's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
73 views

Sets well ordered under different operations Proving

$(a)\quad R^+ \cup \{0\}, <$ $(b)\quad [0,1], >$ $(c)\quad \text{The set of integers divisible by 5}, <$ $(d)\quad \{\{0,1,...,n\}|n ∈ N\},⊆$ I believe that: (a) Is not well-ordered ...
Andrew Ryan's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
83 views

How to approach solving this induction problem?

I've been practicing induction and I came across this problem: Consider the following series, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10,20, 40, ..., which starts as an arithmetic series, but after the first 5 terms ...
David J.'s user avatar
  • 303
2 votes
0 answers
1k views

Zorn's lemma, every set can be well-ordered

My task is to prove the well-ordering theorem: Every non empty set $X$ can be well-ordered I want to do so in the following steps, which involve Zorn's lemma: Step 1): Let $X$ be non empty and $\...
Cornman's user avatar
  • 11.2k
1 vote
0 answers
503 views

Well Ordering Principle sum of natural Numbers help

I was reading over the following solution for the sum of all natural numbers using the well-ordering principle. Let Fact 1 be: $$\forall n:\ (1+2+3+...n)=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$ By contradiction, ...
neet's user avatar
  • 117
1 vote
1 answer
80 views

I don't understand how this set can be contained in $\Bbb N$

In my lecture notes there is a proof for the division algorithm which sets $S=\{a-xb|x\in \Bbb Z, a-xb \geq 0 \}$ then says $S\subset\Bbb N$ so we can use the well ordering principle. There's a ...
excalibirr's user avatar
  • 2,815
0 votes
3 answers
71 views

Prove that for every natural number $a$ there are integers $t \geq 0$ and $r$ such that $a = 3^t r$ and 3 does not divide r.

Prove that for every natural number $a$ there are integers $t \geq 0$ and $r$ such that $a = 3^tr$ and $3 \not | r$. Would I use the well ordering principle for this? There’s so many variables so I’m ...
Dani Jo's user avatar
  • 93

15 30 50 per page