Skip to main content

All Questions

-2 votes
1 answer
573 views

is a set of equivalence classes in R x R countable? [closed]

An equivalence class in R x R is uncountable but is the set of equivalence classes in R x R countable?
canvan's user avatar
  • 15
-2 votes
1 answer
343 views

countability of a set of uncountable many real intervals?

Consider a real line $R$ and for each $i ∈ R$ there is a real line, $R_i$, that intersects $R$ at $i$; the $R$ and $R_i$ share only the number $i$ and let none of $R_i$ intersect. Since each $R_i$ ...
canvan's user avatar
  • 15
1 vote
3 answers
371 views

Are there real numbers that cannot be uniquely expressed with a finite number of symbols?

Are there real numbers that cannot be uniquely expressed with a finite number of symbols? Is this the same thing as an uncomputable number? I can show that if there is one such number then there are ...
Zachary F's user avatar
  • 1,894
2 votes
1 answer
645 views

Why set of real numbers not a set of ordered pairs?

Why set of real numbers not a set of ordered pairs ? We write $\mathbb{R}^2 = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}$, then we define addition and multiplication on this new set. Together with those ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
153 views

Family of almost disjoint subsets of $\mathbb{R}_+$ (where non-disjointness is bounded)

Let $\mathbb{R}_+ = [0, \infty)$. I'm looking for a family $\mathcal{U}$ of $2^\mathfrak{c}$ subsets of $\mathbb{R}_+$, such that any member of $\mathcal{U}$ is unbounded in $\mathbb{R}_+$, but the ...
xyzzyz's user avatar
  • 7,674
1 vote
0 answers
140 views

Brief overview of the foundations of math?

I am very interested in finding out about the foundations of math. When I feel foolish enough to try, I visit Wikipedia and end up in a truly endless rabbit hole. There are dozens of terms that I don'...
Ovi's user avatar
  • 23.8k
6 votes
2 answers
729 views

Well-orderings of $\mathbb R$ without Choice

The question is about well-ordering $\mathbb R$ in ZF. Without the Axiom of Choice (AC) there exists a set that is not well-ordered. This could occur two ways: a) there are models of ZF in which $\...
user4894's user avatar
  • 3,009
2 votes
1 answer
100 views

Decimal expansions and topological connectedness

I'm a bit confused by the following footnote from Moschovakis's Notes on Set Theory, p. 135fn24 (in the note, $\mathcal{N}$ denotes the Baire space). The puzzling part is in bold: One may think of $...
Nagase's user avatar
  • 5,537
1 vote
0 answers
111 views

Is there a model of ZFC in which every real number is definable? [duplicate]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definable_real_number Wikipedia defines a "definable real number" as one definable by a parameter-free formula in the language of set theory. The article says, "The set ...
vhspdfg's user avatar
  • 864
1 vote
1 answer
95 views

Fields of intermediate cardinality (2)

Assuming the existence of a cardinal $\aleph_0 <\mathfrak{m} < 2^{\aleph_0}$, does it follow that there is a subfield of $\mathbb{R}$ of cardinality $\mathfrak{m}$ containing no algebraic ...
Daniel's user avatar
  • 169
2 votes
2 answers
178 views

Fields of intermediate cardinality

Assuming the existence of a cardinal $\aleph_0 <\mathfrak{m} < 2^{\aleph_0}$, does it follow that there is a subfield of $\mathbb{R}$ of cardinality $\mathfrak{m}$?
Daniel's user avatar
  • 169
1 vote
2 answers
422 views

Real numbers for beginners

I am thinking about the Wikipedia (I understand disputed) article about “definable real numbers”. It begins to say that, A real number $a$ is first-order definable in the language of set theory, ...
Mikael Jensen's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

More than the real numbers: hyperreals, superreals, surreals ...?

I've read something about extensions of the real numbers, as hyperreals, superreals, surreals and, as I can understand, all these extensions contain some new kinds of infinitesimal and infinite ''...
Emilio Novati's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

Definable real numbers

Reading this Wikipedia page I found this definition: A real number $a$ is first-order definable in the language of set theory, without parameters, if there is a formula $\phi$ in the language ...
Emilio Novati's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
1k views

Undefinable Real Numbers

Disclamer: I'm sure my definition of "definable" may be different than the/a established mathematical one, I am more than interested in learning why/how this is so, but that is not my question Part 1:...
8bitwide's user avatar
  • 133
4 votes
1 answer
369 views

Maximal model for ℝ?

I have not dealt professionally with set theory, so excuse me if my way of formulating this question does not completely follow standard terminology. Actually, my question is about whether or not the ...
Gaussler's user avatar
  • 2,796
0 votes
1 answer
195 views

Axiom of choice and an example of a Well-ordered $\Bbb R$

From the axiom of choice we get that every set can be ordered in a way that will make it a well ordered set, including $\Bbb R$. However, since the ordinal of such a well-ordered set of $\Bbb R$ will ...
Studentmath's user avatar
9 votes
4 answers
2k views

Using Zorn's lemma show that $\mathbb R^+$ is the disjoint union of two sets closed under addition.

Let $\Bbb R^+$ be the set of positive real numbers. Use Zorn's Lemma to show that $\Bbb R^+$ is the union of two disjoint, non-empty subsets, each closed under addition.
Omar's user avatar
  • 517
11 votes
1 answer
2k views

The well ordering principle

Here is the statement of The Well Ordering Principle: If $A$ is a nonempty set, then there exists a linear ordering of A such that the set is well ordered. In the book, it says that the chief ...
Yuan's user avatar
  • 563

15 30 50 per page
1 2
3