Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
74 views

Why doesn't $RCA_0$ prove $\Sigma^0_1$-comprehension?

Answer: because that's $ACA_0$, alright, but: Friedman et al.'s 1983 "Countable algebra and set existence axioms" has [verbatim, including old terminology and dubious notation]: Lemma 1.6 ($...
ac15's user avatar
  • 1,084
2 votes
0 answers
72 views

Understanding the system $\textbf{ACA}_0'$ and and exercise $6.26$ of Hirschfeldt

The system $\textbf{ACA}_0' $ is the theory $ \textbf{ACA}_0 $ plus the statement $\forall n\,\forall X \,\exists X^{(n)}$. I'm not entirely sure what the proper way to express this as a second order ...
MIO's user avatar
  • 1,926
2 votes
0 answers
57 views

A Peano system with an infinite initial segment

Let $T$ be a binary tree with the lexicographic order. And $f:T→T$ be the successor operation. We denote the empty sequence in $T$ by $i$. Also Suppose that: For all $X⊂T$ if these two conditions hold:...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
59 views

The set of all finite sequences in RCA0

In the book "subsystems of second order arithmetic", page 68, Simpson claimed that the set of all codes of finite sequences (denoted by "Seq") exists by sigma 0-0 comprehension. I ...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
46 views

In RCA0, Prove that for all n, fⁿ(i) exists

I wanted to prove in RCA0 that: If f:A→A be a function and i∈A, then for all n, fⁿ(i) exists. To reach that, I proved another theorem. I wrote my proof but I'm not sure it's rigorous. If you read it, ...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
62 views

Does Z₂ Prove the iteration theorem?

iteration theorem: Let (ℕ,0,S) be the structure of natural numbers. And let W be an arbitrary set and c be an arbitrary member of W and g be a function from W into W. Then, there is a unique function ...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
107 views

What is the importance of Peano categoricity?

We know that Dedekind in 1888 proved that second order peano arithmetic(PA2) is categorical. My question is, why is it important? Does it have any mathematical, philosophical or foundamental ...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
39 views

Peano categoricity is equivalent to weak konig lemma

Peano categoricity (PC) says that: Every model for second order peano system is isomorphic to standard model. i.e PC says that every peano system such as (A, f, i) is isomorphic to (N, S, 0). Simpson ...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
494 views

What is the difference between "Peano arithmetic," "second-order arithmetic," and "second-order Peano arithmetic?"

I think this needs to be clarified, so it would be helpful to see an answer to this somewhere. I've seen the following terms: Peano arithmetic. Second-order arithmetic. Second-order Peano arithmetic. ...
Maximal Ideal's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
59 views

What subsystem of second-order arithmetic proves the weak Godel’s Theorem?

Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem states that any omega-consistent recursive theory in the language of first-order arithmetic is incomplete. But there is a weaker version of Godel’s Theorem that is ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
115 views

What is the omega-completion of $ACA_0$

The omega rule is an infinitary rule of logic which says that from $\phi(0),\phi(1),\phi(2),...$ you can infer $\forall n\phi(n)$. My question is, what is the theory $T$ obtained by adding the omega ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
167 views

Is it consistent for $P(\mathbb{N})$ to be present in a low layer of the Constructible Universe?

$ZF+V=L$ implies that $P(\mathbb{N})$, the power set of the set of natural numbers, is a subset of $L_{\omega_1}$. But my question is, is it consistent with $ZF$ if $P(\mathbb{N})$ is a subset of $L_{...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
144 views

Differences between real numbers in $ACA_0 + \lnot Con(PA)$ and standard real numbers?

Let $M = (\mathbb N_M, 0_M, +_M, \times_M, <_M, D_M)$ be a model of $ACA_0 + \lnot Con(PA)$. We define $\mathbb R_M$ as Dedekind cuts on $D_M$. What can we say about the differences between $\...
Christopher King's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
131 views

Is there a weak set theory that can prove that the natural numbers is a model of PA?

$ZFC$ proves that $\mathbb N$ is a model of $PA$. Even $ZF$ does. How weak can go? In particular, is there some weak set theory that proves that $\mathbb N$ is a model of $PA$, but does not proof ...
Christopher King's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
335 views

What is one set of axioms which are sufficient for Calculus?

I am curious to find out what are the "minimum axioms" needed in order to be able to have highschool level math. Another way to explain it: if we were visited by a super intelligent race of aliens (...
Ovi's user avatar
  • 23.8k

15 30 50 per page