Questions tagged [meta-math]
Meta-theory is the term for the theory in which mathematics is formalized (often PA, ZFC or similar theories). Meta-mathematical statements are statements which are evaluated at the level of the meta-theory rather than the theory. This tag is for questions regarding meta-mathematical theories, and related topics.
335
questions
0
votes
1
answer
96
views
Platonistic interpretation of Gödel (theorem 14.2, I in Kunen).
On page $41$ in Kunens "Set Theory An Introduction to Independence Proofs", after proving
If $\phi(x)$ is any formula in one free variable, $x$, then there is a sentence $\psi$ such that
$$...
1
vote
1
answer
87
views
Theorem 5.6, chapter IV in Kunens Set Theory
Boldface-letters (i.e. $\mathbf{A}$,$\mathbf{V}$,etc.) indicate a class.
The following is an excerpt from Kunens "Set Theory An Introduction to Independence Proofs" (theorem 5.6, $\S5$ of ...
1
vote
1
answer
74
views
Why doesn't $RCA_0$ prove $\Sigma^0_1$-comprehension?
Answer: because that's $ACA_0$, alright, but:
Friedman et al.'s 1983 "Countable algebra and set existence axioms" has [verbatim, including old terminology and dubious notation]:
Lemma 1.6 ($...
0
votes
0
answers
64
views
How do we escape infinite regress when discussing truth in mathematical logic? [duplicate]
In (first-order) logic, I understand that there are two notions of the truth of a sentence $\phi$ in a theory $T$:
Syntactic truth: $T\vdash \phi$ if $\phi$ is provable from $T$,
Semantic truth: $T\...
4
votes
3
answers
222
views
Understanding Metatheory and the Broader Picture of Foundational Set Theory
So I'm trying to put together a clearer picture of what is going on when we study set theory. I'll describe my current picture which I'd appreciate some feedback on, and I'll ask some specific ...
10
votes
2
answers
1k
views
If set theory only contains the notions of “set” and “is a member of” as primitives, how can an axiom of set theory refer to a “formula”?
It's said that the primitive concepts of set theory are those of "set" and "membership", then all axioms of set theory must begin with "Let $A$ be a set" or "Let $x\...
2
votes
2
answers
133
views
Meaning of "theorem of a system"
The following excerpt is from page 357 of Logic: The Laws of Truth by Nicholas Smith:
Given a system of proof - say, the tree method for GPLI - we call propositions that can be proven using that ...
6
votes
1
answer
957
views
Math that does not have infinity
I am not a mathematician. So I am not even sure if what I am asking is logically coherent. But I do have some application-based curiosity that I would like to enlighten myself about. I will first pose,...
0
votes
3
answers
96
views
does deductive completeness implies semantic completeness
i wanted to understand godel's $ \ \bf completeness \ $ theorem, so while doing some research on google i found this wikipedia page " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%...
1
vote
2
answers
143
views
Isn't the Compactness theorem in propositional logic trivial?
I am learning propositional logic via a script.
The compactness theorem is presented as: " Let S be a set of propositional formulas. If each finite subset of S is satisfiable, then
S is ...
4
votes
2
answers
229
views
What is a "class model" exactly?
In the literature about set theory, one encounters the words "set-model" and "class-model" which I have difficulties to understand. Here is my viewpoint :
One starts with a ...
0
votes
0
answers
127
views
What is the most primitive notion in mathematics?
I had a recent conversation with a professional mathematician about the status of relations, functions and predicates. I was arguing that it seems intuitive (to me at least) to classify them in this ...
0
votes
0
answers
88
views
What is the categorical setting for higher-level real analysis?
A lot of disciplines in higher-level mathematics can be summarized by describing what objects they study and in what setting they are studied in. For example,
Topology is the study of topological ...
3
votes
3
answers
184
views
What does it mean for one theorem to depend on another?
Recently, there is a happy result by some high-schoolers: a proof of Pythagoras by using trigonometry without using circular reasoning i.e. $\sin^2A + \cos^2A = 1$. Good for them, hurray!
But it got ...
2
votes
1
answer
194
views
Type Theory as a Meta-Language for Logic
I am unsure which StackExchange site is the most appropriate for this question, but I believe this site is the most appropriate.
My current project involves rigorously proving all the mathematical ...