2
$\begingroup$

Let's consider a reaction A (reactant) -> B(product) and activated complex is denoted by C.

enter image description here

This graph ( potential energy vs reaction coordinate ) tells us that reactant need some amount of activation energy (Ea) to convert in product, which has low potential energy which is shown here in terms of enthalpy ∆H. We can assume from this graph that activation represent same kind of potential energy between A (reactant) and C (activated complex ) that Enthalpy ∆H represent between A and B (product).

Now look at another graph of reaction (Gibbs free energy vs extent of reaction)

enter image description here

This graph represents that activation energy is difference between Gibbs free energy of reactant and activated complex or there is also possibility that the activation energy shown here is not arrhenius activation energy Ea but it is Gibbs energy of activation ΔG‡ according to transition state theory.


Q. But to perform a reaction what amount of energy we need to supply to reactants arrhenius activation energy Ea or gibbs free energy of activation ΔG‡ ? I think it's ΔG‡ as defination of Gibbs free energy states - minimum amount of work needed to supply for a non spontaneous reaction (here A -> C ) to be happened but then why arrhenius theory states that - for reactants to transform into products, they must first acquire a minimum amount of energy, called the activation energy Ea ?

And also what these two energies represent physically in terms of bonds , interatomic interactions etc ?

Mathematical equations -

ΔG‡ = ∆H‡ - T∆S‡

ΔG‡ = Ea - RT - T∆S‡ ( ∆H‡ = Ea - RT )


$\endgroup$
15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here are two sources (oxford lecture notes and wikibooks) to look into this topic further than the Libretext source cited in the question. $\endgroup$
    – Karsten
    Commented Jul 31, 2023 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ It is possible that you are mixing several concepts that are related but are not identical. $\mathrm{E_a}$ stems from the Arrhenius equation that describes the dependence of k(T) with temperature. $\mathrm{E_a}$ is an empirical parameter. ... $\endgroup$
    – PAEP
    Commented Jul 31, 2023 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ (cont.) However, for a simple reaction profile that presents a barrier between reactants and products, Fowler and Guggenheim showed that $\mathrm{E_a}$ roghtly corresponds to difference be the average energy of the molecules that react and the average energy of the reactant molecules (see K. J. Laidler, Chemical Kinetics, Pearson,1987). ... $\endgroup$
    – PAEP
    Commented Jul 31, 2023 at 17:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By the way you can access Clare Vallance lecture notes through the link provided by @Karsten. I checked it today and yesterday. It is a link to a pdf file, so you need a pdf reader. $\endgroup$
    – PAEP
    Commented Aug 1, 2023 at 13:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please note that the activated complex model is outdated and superseded by transition state theory. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 2, 2023 at 22:14

0