SlideShare a Scribd company logo

UK RepositoryNet+

•Download as PPTX, PDF•
•
EDINA, University of Edinburgh
EDINA, University of Edinburgh

1) The document discusses services provided by RepNet to help address challenges faced by institutional repositories (IRs) around deposit, discovery, reporting, and dissemination of research outputs. 2) Key services include automated deposit tools, aggregation of IR metadata to improve discovery, and services to enhance metadata and reporting on research outputs and impact. 3) RepNet aims to help IRs meet funder and institutional requirements by integrating with other research information systems through standards like CERIF.

Related slideshows

RJ Broker, ORI, & OpenDepot.org
RJ Broker, ORI, & OpenDepot.orgRJ Broker, ORI, & OpenDepot.org
RJ Broker, ORI, & OpenDepot.org
 
Who is doing what, and how do we know? [PEPRS]
Who is doing what, and how do we know? [PEPRS]Who is doing what, and how do we know? [PEPRS]
Who is doing what, and how do we know? [PEPRS]
 
Research Data MANTRA Project at Edinburgh
Research Data MANTRA Project at EdinburghResearch Data MANTRA Project at Edinburgh
Research Data MANTRA Project at Edinburgh
 
1 of 12
RSP Event Supporting and Enhancing Your Repository 21st January, 2013 Andrew Dorward
Wave 1 Decisions by JISC A: Aggregation, Text mining & Search D: Deposit Tools Innovation Zone REPUK RoMEO Wave 1 Innovation zone Juliet CORE Wave 1 IRS Innovation Zone B: Benchmarking, Statistics and Report RJBroker Wave 1 IRUS-UK Wave 1 C: Creating Relevant Registries E: Enhancing Metadata Quality Open ITT - OARR NAMES2 Align with ORCID DOAR ITT - OARR ROAR ORI Wave 1 2
RepNet Service Portfolio (ITIL) Continual Service Service Service Improvement Concepts Design Third-party components Market Research RoMEO-Hosted JULIET-Hosted Service Operational Services Retired IRUS-UK Transition Innovation Services ORI RoMEO Zone RJBroker JULIET (REPUK, CORE, IRS) 3
Overview External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems Wave 1 components HEI CRIS Systems - Reporting and Deposit IR Managers R-J Broker KPL Study RoMEO JULIET IRUS-UK on Search ORI OpenDOAR ROAR Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 4
RepNet snapshot – Autumn 2012 External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems HEI CRIS Systems IR Managers R-J Broker KPL RoMEO JULIET IRUS-UK Report on Search ORI OpenDOAR ROAR Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 5
RepNet snapshot – Winter 2012-13 External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems IR Managers HEI CRIS Systems RepNet Service Catalogue RepNet Service Desk R-J Broker KPL OARR RoMEO JULIET IRUS-UK Report on Search ORI OpenDOAR ROAR Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 6
Review of new functionality for RepNet services Supporting activities HEI Finance Systems Consider for inclusion in RepNet service catalogue HEI CRIS Systems IR Managers RepNet Service Catalogue CERIF/OAI- RepNet Service Desk PMH RIOXX Project ISNI/ORCID OARR Reporting R-J Broker KPL RoMEO JULIET Metadata CRIS/Sword IRUS-UK Benchmark Enhancement EndPoints Report on Publisher Search Website KeepIt (Eprints) Delivery ORI PDF->XML OpenDOAR DOI retrieval – Cross-Ref ROAR Fund-Ref Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata Gap analysis and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 7
Potential Reconfiguration + Aggregation Supporting activities Potential Application onto Components HEI Finance Systems Available through RepNet service catalogue Potential New Service IR Managers HEI CRIS Systems RepNet Service Catalogue CERIF/OAI- RepNet Service Desk PMH Rules-based RIOXX Project Deposit for Broker ISNI/ORCID OARR Reporting from R-J Broker KPL RoMEO JULIET Metadata CRIS/Sword RoMEO/JULIET IRUS-UK Benchmark Enhancement EndPoints Report on Publisher data Search Website KeepIt (Eprints) Delivery ORI PDF->XML Deposit OpenDOAR DOI retrieval monitor – Cross-Ref ROAR Fund-Ref Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality GAP Aggregation middleware: from Registry, for Monitoring (and Search) 8
Use cases for potential new applications - Pablo 9
The Value to Repository Managers - what’s in it for me? 10
The 4 challenges for IRs: Deposit; Discover; Report; Disseminate Deposit • How to increase deposit rates into IRs, particularly full-text? • How to address publisher/funder OA policies at time of deposit and impact on definition of item copyright and access levels? Discover • How to improve repository content indexing rates for Google/Google Scholar? • What means to measure and improve these? • Faceted search functionality for researchers/reporting? Report • How can IRs address institutional and funder reporting requirements for OA policy? • How can IRs co-exist with HEI CRIS systems? [1] Disseminate • How to establish best practise with peers? • How to measure KPIs against peers? • How to establish IR’s value within HEI? [1] there is a clear trend to making CERIF and CRISs the default standards for provision and exchange of research information. The transition to this model may affect demand over time for RepNet services. One of the RIOXX specific objectives is to “develop these [recommendations] such that they pave the way for a likely CERIF-based solution in the medium-long term” (http://blog.paulwalk.net/2012/12/23/rioxx-application-profile-draft-1/) 11
How challenges are addressed by RepNet Deposit • Automated deposit from funder and subject repositories, publishers into IRs via R-J Broker • Publisher and funder policies from RoMEO and JULIET • Further automation of R-J Broker through rules derived from R/J Discover • UK-wide aggregation to collate IR metadata and expose OAI-PMH as tagged files for indexing • Measure discoverability as download stats via IRUS Report • Metadata enhancement through RIOXX, V4OA • Enrichment through feeds from CrossRef (DOI), Fundref (Funder, project ID), IRIOS/UKRISS (output linked to funder info) • Report on mandate compliance through to research impact via service built on aggregation Disseminate • IR-focussed events through RSP, UKCoRR, COAR • IRUS, OARR for providing benchmarking • Improved project-based reporting; interoperability with CRIS through CERIF; RepNet as observatory for IR-CRIS transition 12

More Related Content

UK RepositoryNet+

  • 1. RSP Event Supporting and Enhancing Your Repository 21st January, 2013 Andrew Dorward
  • 2. Wave 1 Decisions by JISC A: Aggregation, Text mining & Search D: Deposit Tools Innovation Zone REPUK RoMEO Wave 1 Innovation zone Juliet CORE Wave 1 IRS Innovation Zone B: Benchmarking, Statistics and Report RJBroker Wave 1 IRUS-UK Wave 1 C: Creating Relevant Registries E: Enhancing Metadata Quality Open ITT - OARR NAMES2 Align with ORCID DOAR ITT - OARR ROAR ORI Wave 1 2
  • 3. RepNet Service Portfolio (ITIL) Continual Service Service Service Improvement Concepts Design Third-party components Market Research RoMEO-Hosted JULIET-Hosted Service Operational Services Retired IRUS-UK Transition Innovation Services ORI RoMEO Zone RJBroker JULIET (REPUK, CORE, IRS) 3
  • 4. Overview External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems Wave 1 components HEI CRIS Systems - Reporting and Deposit IR Managers R-J Broker KPL Study RoMEO JULIET IRUS-UK on Search ORI OpenDOAR ROAR Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 4
  • 5. RepNet snapshot – Autumn 2012 External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems HEI CRIS Systems IR Managers R-J Broker KPL RoMEO JULIET IRUS-UK Report on Search ORI OpenDOAR ROAR Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 5
  • 6. RepNet snapshot – Winter 2012-13 External/existing systems/services HEI Finance Systems IR Managers HEI CRIS Systems RepNet Service Catalogue RepNet Service Desk R-J Broker KPL OARR RoMEO JULIET IRUS-UK Report on Search ORI OpenDOAR ROAR Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 6
  • 7. Review of new functionality for RepNet services Supporting activities HEI Finance Systems Consider for inclusion in RepNet service catalogue HEI CRIS Systems IR Managers RepNet Service Catalogue CERIF/OAI- RepNet Service Desk PMH RIOXX Project ISNI/ORCID OARR Reporting R-J Broker KPL RoMEO JULIET Metadata CRIS/Sword IRUS-UK Benchmark Enhancement EndPoints Report on Publisher Search Website KeepIt (Eprints) Delivery ORI PDF->XML OpenDOAR DOI retrieval – Cross-Ref ROAR Fund-Ref Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata Gap analysis and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality 7
  • 8. Potential Reconfiguration + Aggregation Supporting activities Potential Application onto Components HEI Finance Systems Available through RepNet service catalogue Potential New Service IR Managers HEI CRIS Systems RepNet Service Catalogue CERIF/OAI- RepNet Service Desk PMH Rules-based RIOXX Project Deposit for Broker ISNI/ORCID OARR Reporting from R-J Broker KPL RoMEO JULIET Metadata CRIS/Sword RoMEO/JULIET IRUS-UK Benchmark Enhancement EndPoints Report on Publisher data Search Website KeepIt (Eprints) Delivery ORI PDF->XML Deposit OpenDOAR DOI retrieval monitor – Cross-Ref ROAR Fund-Ref Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of Deposit Metadata and Search and Reporting Repositories tools quality GAP Aggregation middleware: from Registry, for Monitoring (and Search) 8
  • 9. Use cases for potential new applications - Pablo 9
  • 10. The Value to Repository Managers - what’s in it for me? 10
  • 11. The 4 challenges for IRs: Deposit; Discover; Report; Disseminate Deposit • How to increase deposit rates into IRs, particularly full-text? • How to address publisher/funder OA policies at time of deposit and impact on definition of item copyright and access levels? Discover • How to improve repository content indexing rates for Google/Google Scholar? • What means to measure and improve these? • Faceted search functionality for researchers/reporting? Report • How can IRs address institutional and funder reporting requirements for OA policy? • How can IRs co-exist with HEI CRIS systems? [1] Disseminate • How to establish best practise with peers? • How to measure KPIs against peers? • How to establish IR’s value within HEI? [1] there is a clear trend to making CERIF and CRISs the default standards for provision and exchange of research information. The transition to this model may affect demand over time for RepNet services. One of the RIOXX specific objectives is to “develop these [recommendations] such that they pave the way for a likely CERIF-based solution in the medium-long term” (http://blog.paulwalk.net/2012/12/23/rioxx-application-profile-draft-1/) 11
  • 12. How challenges are addressed by RepNet Deposit • Automated deposit from funder and subject repositories, publishers into IRs via R-J Broker • Publisher and funder policies from RoMEO and JULIET • Further automation of R-J Broker through rules derived from R/J Discover • UK-wide aggregation to collate IR metadata and expose OAI-PMH as tagged files for indexing • Measure discoverability as download stats via IRUS Report • Metadata enhancement through RIOXX, V4OA • Enrichment through feeds from CrossRef (DOI), Fundref (Funder, project ID), IRIOS/UKRISS (output linked to funder info) • Report on mandate compliance through to research impact via service built on aggregation Disseminate • IR-focussed events through RSP, UKCoRR, COAR • IRUS, OARR for providing benchmarking • Improved project-based reporting; interoperability with CRIS through CERIF; RepNet as observatory for IR-CRIS transition 12