For eight years, Craig Wright has claimed to be the elusive creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. On Monday, in the swelling heat of a London courtroom, a trial began that will settle the question.
Wright, flanked by his legal team, appeared relaxed in the opening stages of the trial, reclining in his chair. His demeanour reflected neither the stakes of the trial nor the forceful rhetoric of the plaintiff’s lawyer, who called Wright's claim to Satoshi-hood a “brazen lie.”
The lawsuit Wright faces was brought by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance, a nonprofit consortium of crypto companies. COPA claims that Wright’s recent history of filing lawsuits predicated on his claim of being Bitcoin’s inventor has driven developers away. It is asking the UK High Court for a declaration, in effect, that Wright is not Nakamoto.
A trio of related lawsuits brought by Wright will be bound by the ruling. If COPA is successful, Wright will have difficulty taking these claims any further. If Wright wins, and is successful in his own cases thereafter, he would be free to decide who is allowed to work on the Bitcoin codebase and under what terms the system can be used. The stakes, says a representative of the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit that is funding the defense of Bitcoin developers in a separate lawsuit filed by Wright, are “very high.”
On Tuesday, Wright took to the witness box. His cross-examination—a so-far attritional process whereby COPA’s lawyer scraps with Wright over the contents and meaning of almost every exhibit—is set to run for days. WIRED will be covering the trial throughout.
https://lnkd.in/e6zYKYUn