Questions tagged [google-sycamore]
A 54-qubit superconducting quantum processor by Google Quantum AI which is claimed to have been used to demonstrate quantum computational supremacy.
38
questions
22
votes
2
answers
4k
views
What does Google's claim of "Quantum Supremacy" mean for the question of BQP vs BPP vs NP?
Google recently announced that they have achieved "Quantum Supremacy": "that would be practically impossible for a classical machine."
Does this mean that they have definitely proved that BQP ≠ BPP ?...
- 675
18
votes
1
answer
4k
views
Which subatomic particle does each company use in quantum computing?
Probably each company (Google, Amazon, Intel, IBM, Microsoft, D-Wave and so on) uses a mix of subatomic particles and technologies. I would like to know which particles/technologies are used by each ...
15
votes
1
answer
538
views
Status of Google's quantum supremacy claim 2022
More than a year ago a couple of scientists made a splash by presenting a classical algorithm that took less than a week to simulate Sycamore's circuits on a small GPU cluster. Also, their simulations ...
- 2,813
13
votes
3
answers
740
views
Why do the IBM and Google processors both have 53 qubits?
As I understand from this IBM post both the IBM and Google teams have independently built 53-qubit processors. What is the significance of the number 53? It is purely coincidental, or is there a ...
- 233
12
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Understanding Google's “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor” (Part 1): choice of gate set
I was recently going through the paper titled "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor" by NASA Ames Research Centre and the Google Quantum AI team (note that the paper was ...
- 17.7k
10
votes
1
answer
740
views
Why Google has used $\sqrt{X}$ and $\sqrt{Y}$ instead of $X$ and $Y$ in supremacy experiment?
In supremacy experiment Google has used $\sqrt{X}$ and $\sqrt{Y}$ as two of their single qubit gates (paper).
So My questions are:
Is there any specific reason for choosing these gates and not $X$...
- 313
10
votes
2
answers
570
views
Number of qubits to achieve quantum supremacy?
Google's Sycamore paper describes achieving quantum supremacy on a $53$-qubit quantum computer. The layout of Sycamore is $n=6\times 9=54$ nearest neighbors, with one qubit nonfunctional. They apply ...
- 12.9k
9
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Understanding Google's “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor” (Part 2): simplifiable and intractable tilings
In Google's 54 qubit Sycamore processor, they created a 53 qubit quantum circuit using a random selection of gates from the set $\{\sqrt{X}, \sqrt{Y}, \sqrt{W}\}$ in the following pattern:
...
- 17.7k
9
votes
0
answers
191
views
How can time crystals be useful in qRAM design?
A time crystal is a phase of a matter which is ordered in time, similar to classical crystals which are ordered spatially. In other words, the structure of a time crystal is ever-changing but with ...
- 14.6k
8
votes
0
answers
284
views
What is a gate-level circuit used in the 2022 Jafferis et al. experiment on Sycamore?
A recently published Nature paper of Jafferis et al. describes an experiment with a handful of qubits performed on Google's Sycamore processor to explore the SYK model in the context of AdS/CFT and ...
- 12.9k
7
votes
3
answers
3k
views
How are the IBM's and Google's Hadamard gates fabricated and operated?
There are thousands of articles, books and web sites describing the Hadamard Gate from a theoretical point of view.
But I haven't been able to find any photo about any real implementeation of a ...
- 173
7
votes
1
answer
354
views
What did exactly Google do in simulating a random quantum circuit on a classical computer in supremacy experiment?
I've been working on Google quantum supremacy paper for quite some time now and I have a problem in understanding how exactly they simulate their actual random quantum circuit on a classical computer.
...
- 313
7
votes
1
answer
279
views
Publicly available samples for quantum circuits and/or simulators
With Yosi Rinott and Tomer Shoham we studied various statistical aspects of samples coming from NISQ computers.
My question is about available data consisting of samples from NISQ computers
We would ...
- 201
7
votes
1
answer
430
views
Why does Google's quantum processor outperform IBM's?
I understand that both have 53 qubit devices, yet it is Google that has demonstrated quantum supremacy (although IBM refutes this!). I'm not sure if this is true but it seems like IBM cannot replicate ...
- 3,085
7
votes
1
answer
295
views
Are 20 repetitions of Sycamore's one- and 2-qubit gates sufficient to produce a uniformly random state?
In the answer to this question about random circuits, James Wootton states:
One way to see how well we [fully explore the Hilbert space] is to focus on just randomly producing $n$ qubit states. ...
- 12.9k