UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations Security Council on Monday (Mar 25) demanded an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages after the United States abstained from the vote.
The remaining 14 council members voted for the resolution, which was proposed by the 10 elected members of the body.
"The Palestinian people has suffered greatly. This bloodbath has continued for far too long. It is our obligation to put an end to this bloodbath, before it is too late," Algeria's UN Ambassador Amar Bendjama told the council after the vote.
Israeli army radio reported shortly before the council meeting started that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would cancel a planned delegation to Washington if the US did not veto the resolution.
Is there any legal consequence that can come from Israel not abiding by the latest UN resolution? My question is whether the latest resolution would leave Israel open to sanctions from the West, because to me UN resolutions are not legally binding.
The resolution passed earlier today by the UN Security Council is not legally binding, the US asserts.
“It’s a non-binding resolution, so there’s no impact at all on Israel’s ability to continue to go after Hamas,” White House National Security Council John Kirby says in a press briefing, echoing a stance made after the vote by US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield.
The position appears to be shared by South Korea and other members as well.
It seems to me at least that the U.S. won't sanction Israel even if it doesn't abide by the resolution, but I am wondering if the EU thinks that all UN resolutions are not legally binding.