Skip to main content

New answers tagged

1 vote

Is First-Class Constraint Generator of matter Gauge Symmetry in EM example?

The solution to OP's problem is to include a pertinent matter sector in the E&M Lagrangian (3) (in OP's case: a complex scalar $\phi$). This produces the source term in the first-class secondary ...
Qmechanic's user avatar
  • 207k
2 votes

Is First-Class Constraint Generator of matter Gauge Symmetry in EM example?

From @Andrew's comment, I know how to solve it. In scalar QED, EM field would couple to current $J^{\mu}(x) = \phi^{\star}(x)\partial^{\mu}\phi(x) - \phi(x)\partial^{\mu}\phi^{\star}(x)$, and the ...
Ting-Kai Hsu's user avatar
0 votes

Independence of $S$-matrix of $\xi$-gauge in QED

As far as I know, the rigorous proof of the LSZ formula fails in QED because of the photon cloud. Nevertheless, it still seems to work! We just have to physically assume that at $t\to\pm\infty$ the ...
Gabriel Ybarra Marcaida's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Analog between Electromagnetism and Gravity

In electromagnetism, if you have a $$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F^2 + A_\mu J^\mu $$ where $F^2=F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ is the Maxwell term ($F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu$), the ...
Andrew's user avatar
  • 51.2k
1 vote
Accepted

Writing gauge transformation of the gauge fields explicitly in terms of coordinates

Assume a field $\psi(x)$ transforming with respect to some arbitrary representation $$U(x)=e^{-i \alpha_a(x) T_a}, \qquad [T_a,T_b]= i f_{abc}T_c$$ of your gauge group. Defining the matrix-valued ...
Hyperon's user avatar
  • 6,734
1 vote

Writing gauge transformation of the gauge fields explicitly in terms of coordinates

Your derivative term should be $$ (\partial_\mu g) g^{-1}. $$ This combination is an element of the Lie algebra,and so expressible as a sum of the $t^\alpha$, unlike the group element $g$ itself. It'...
mike stone's user avatar
  • 54.5k
0 votes

How to find a covariant gauge derivative from a field transformation

I'll give the example for SU(N): Consider a field $\Phi$ in the fundamental representation of SU(N) which means that $\Phi \to U \Phi$, with $U \in SU(N)$. Now consider how its ordinary derivative ...
Guliano's user avatar
  • 1,041
0 votes

Misconceptions in spontaneous symmetry breaking

For completeness let us write down the potential $$V(\phi)=-\mu^2\phi^2+\lambda \phi^4$$ In what follows we will use the term "invariant", which means: "does not change". The ...
Maik H.'s user avatar
  • 88

Top 50 recent answers are included