Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 312649

For questions where the dynamical variables are fields, that is, functions of several variables (typically, one time coordinate and several space coordinates). Comprises both classical field theory and quantum field theory. Use this tag when the question applies to both classical and quantum phenomena. Otherwise, use the specific tag instead.

2 votes
1 answer
72 views

Understanding Example 36.7 in the Blundell's Quantum field theory

I am reading Blundell's Quantum field thoery for the gifted amateur, p.332, Example 36.7 and stuck at understanding some calculation. In the example, he expresses $$ \Sigma_{s=1}^{2}u^{s}(p)\bar{u}^{s …
Plantation's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
81 views

Expression of a Lagrangian in other form

I'm reading Matthew D. Schwartz, Quantum field theory and standard model and some question arises In his book, p.133, he says that Any vector field can be written as $$ A_{\mu}(x) = A^{T}_{\mu}(x)+ \p …
Plantation's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
91 views

Question about p.192 in Schwartz, Quantum field theory (Regarding the rewriting of the Major... [closed]

I'am reading the Schwartz's Quantum field theory and Standard model p.192 and some question arises: Why the underlined equality is true? Here, $\bar{\psi} : = \psi^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}$ is the conjuga …
Plantation's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
63 views

Taylor expansion of some Lagrangian (Understanding the Blundell's Quantum field theory, Exam...

I am reading the Lancaster, Blundell's Quantum field theory for the Gifted Amateur, p.243, Example 26.5 and I can't understand some sentences and I don't know how to expand some Lagrangian. I am a mat …
Plantation's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
61 views

Lorentz invariance of the Dirac equation and implicability of the Klein-Gordon equation from... [closed]

I am reading the Peskin & Schroeder's Introduction to quantum field theory, p.42~43 and don't understand some points. In their book p.42 they say that "To show that it (the Dirac equation) is Lorentz …
Plantation's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
209 views

In calculation of Hamiltonian of real scalar field (Quantum field theory Srednicki)

I'm now reading the Mark Srednicki, Quantum field theory, p.27 I'm now trying to understand the Third step in the calculation of $H$. Through the integration over $k'$ involving the delta function …
Plantation's user avatar