Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
1 answer
85 views

Why is $Tr_R(T_a\{T_bT_c\})=-Tr_\overline{R}(T_a\{T_bT_c\})$ for $SU(N)$ representations?

I'm looking at the chiral anomaly in QFT and the term $$d_{abc}=Tr_R(T_a\{T_b,T_c\})$$ shows up where $Tr_R$ means the trace in the representation $R$, $\overline{R}$ is the conjugate representation ...
acernine's user avatar
  • 248
1 vote
0 answers
153 views

Anomalies, 2-cocycles and (D+1)-cocycles

I'm learning about anomalies and I'm a bit confused about their relationships to 2-cocycles and 3-cocycles (in the group cohomology $H^{\bullet}(G, U(1))$). The below might only apply to 't Hooft ...
quixot's user avatar
  • 143
3 votes
1 answer
156 views

Apparent elimination of a 't Hooft anomaly in quantum spin system

The simplest system with a 't Hooft anomaly is the spin $\frac{1}{2}$ system with hamiltonian $\hat{H}=0$. The 't Hooft anomaly follows from the fact that such system has a trivial $SO(3)$ symmetry, ...
Lucas Queiroz's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
304 views

Why should a projective representation of a classical symmetry lift to a non-projective representation?

Background Take a classical system with symmetry $G$. Suppose we can quantize this to a quantum system with Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$. The state space of the quantum system is given by the ...
leob's user avatar
  • 559
8 votes
1 answer
459 views

How projective representations can lead to 't Hooft anomalies in quantum mechanics?

In Shao's talk https://youtu.be/2vTvHYYl1Qk?t=1554, he argues that in quantum mechanics "if a symmetry acts projectively on states, then we have a t' Hooft anomaly". But I'm having trouble ...
Lucas Queiroz's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
369 views

Why are gauge anomalies characterised by the non-triviality of $\pi_5(\mathcal G)$?

The folklore in 4-dimensional gauge theories is that the existence of potential gauge anomalies from the triangle diagrams that need to be cancelled are characterised by the non-triviality of the ...
Nihar Karve's user avatar
  • 8,492
4 votes
1 answer
302 views

2D anomaly-free condition for a gauge theory

Take a $SU(2)$ gauge theory in 2d spacetime, say there are $n_1$ left-handed Weyl fermion in spin-1 written as $$ 1_L, $$ and $n_0$ left-handed Weyl fermion in spin-0 written as $$ 0_L . $$ and $n_{1/...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
263 views

axial anomaly for adjoint fermion v.s. fundamental fermion

It is known that the axial anomaly (chiral anomaly, the left L- right R) shows that $U(1)_A$-axial symmetry is not a global symmetry at quantum level. In particular, one can consider the (1) ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
1k views

Anomaly of the $\text{U}(1)$-$\text{SU}(2)$-$\text{SU}(3)$ triangle diagram

In Srednicki's textbook "Quantum Field Theory", Problem 89.3 asks us to show that the Standard Model is anomaly free. I am puzzled by the triangle-vertex diagram whose external lines are a combination ...
Shen's user avatar
  • 1,653
7 votes
1 answer
624 views

Why is 2 a pseudoreal representation and there is no 2-2-2 anomaly?

In Srednicki's textbook "Quantum Field Theory", Problem 89.3 asks us to show that the Standard Model is anomaly free. The answer is given in the solutions manual. On page 150 of the solutions manual, ...
Shen's user avatar
  • 1,653
5 votes
1 answer
4k views

Anomaly cancellation in the standard model (calculating the symmetrized trace of generators)

The Problem We can show that the condition for the Standard Model to be anomaly-free is that the symmetrized trace over the generators of the gauge group vanishes: \begin{align} \text{tr} \big(\{\...
Jonathan Rayner's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
1k views

Traces in different representation

I am actually working with Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation mechanism in which I have came across a strange formula which relates trace in the adjoint representation (Tr) to trace in fundamental ...
user44895's user avatar
  • 662