Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
97 views

Hamiltonian formalism (with symplectic form) for time-dependent Lagrangian

I have been working on some results that work for time-independent Lagrangians $L\Big(q,\dot{q}\Big)$ and return a Hamiltonian function $$ H(q,\dot{q})=\dot{q}^i \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i}-...
P. C. Spaniel's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
49 views

Discrepancy in Maxwell's extended Hamiltonian

In the 4D Maxwell's extended Hamiltonian action, I obtain the same expression of Fuentealba, Henneaux and Troessaert (see the picture), up to the term "$\partial^i\pi^0 A_i$", although my ...
hyriusen's user avatar
  • 175
15 votes
1 answer
350 views

What is the full algebra of BRST-invariant observables for general relativity?

The Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity - either in the ADM formalism or in Ashtekar variables - is straightforwardly a gauge theory. While the BRST formalism has primarily been developed to ...
ACuriousMind's user avatar
  • 126k
9 votes
1 answer
568 views

Constraints Generating Gauge Transformations and BRST

Given a gauge-invariant point particle action with first class primary constraints $\phi_a$ of the form ([1], eq. (2.36)) $$S = \int d \tau[p_I \dot{q}^I - u^a \phi_a]\tag{1}$$ we know immediately, ...
bolbteppa's user avatar
  • 4,101
1 vote
0 answers
35 views

Problem evaluating an anticommutator in supersymmetric quantum mechanical gauge theory

I am trying to reproduce the results of a certain paper here. In particular, I'm trying to verify their eqn 5.31. The setup is N = 4 gauge quantum mechanics, obtained by the dimensional reduction of N ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
5 votes
1 answer
209 views

Understanding a supersymmetric quantum mechanical gauge theory model

I'm studying this paper on supersymmetric ground state wavefunctions. In section 5 "quantum mechanical gauge theories", it says: "We begin with the ${\cal N} = 2$ gauge theory which ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
0 votes
0 answers
85 views

Secondary constraint imposed gauge fields

I am asking about aspects of quantizing electromagnetic field followed in Weinberg's Quantum theory of fields Volume I, in section 8.2 . I am able to understand the primary constraint that arises from ...
shubham-sinha's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
77 views

Gauge symmetry and the volume in phase space

Recently, I am reading a paper about the soft theorem and large gauge symmetry which is non-zero in the boundary. In section 6, the author introduces the covariant phase space method to illuminate why ...
Lain's user avatar
  • 347
2 votes
1 answer
331 views

Nilpotency of the BRST operator

I'm styding chapter 16 of Peskin and Schroeder, in section 16.4 on the BRST symmetry, Peskin and Schroeder first checks (on page 518) that if $Q$ is the BRST symmetry operator, then $$Q^2\phi=0\tag{16....
Simplyorange's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
71 views

Hamiltonian and Lagrangian for a particle on a ring [duplicate]

In the book Condensed Matter Field Theory (A. Altland & B. Simons)(page 498, 2nd edition) they suggest the following Hamiltonian and Lagrangian for a particle on a ring in the presence of a ...
Noam Ophir's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
73 views

Hamiltonian density of Abelian-Higgs Lagrangian

Given the Lagrangian density $$\mathcal{L}=-(\nabla^{\mu}\phi)^\dagger(\nabla_\mu \phi)-\frac{\lambda}{4}\left(\phi^{\dagger}\phi-v^2\right)^2-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\,,\quad \nabla_\mu\phi=\...
88888888's user avatar
  • 175
1 vote
1 answer
144 views

How to derive infinitesimal gauge transformations from constraints?

I am reading some papers about quantizing the gravitational fields, for example, here, here, and here. Since the classical actions for gravitational fields are singular, they contain some constraints. ...
Haorong Wu's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
168 views

Can I write the Hamiltonian $H$ in the standard way $p\dot{q}-L$ for a general QFT?

I have read some questions (and the Wikipedia article) about the hamiltonian formulation of a QFT, but the only example that seems to be brought up is the scalar case, saying that $$\mathcal{H}_S=\Pi\...
Mauro Giliberti's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
324 views

What is the difference between gauge transformation and canonical transformation?

Recently I have been studying theoretical mechanics, then I have this question, Is the gauge transformation the same as the canonical transformation?
a Fish in Dirac Sea's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
136 views

Dirac-Bergmann Algorithm Not Terminating in (1+1)-Dimensional $U(1)$ Charged Scalar QED

I am trying to compute the full set of second class constraints that specify (1+1)-dimensional $U(1)$ scalar QED after complete gauge fixing. (Specifically, I would like to use the Coulomb $\partial_1 ...
Giovanni's user avatar

15 30 50 per page