Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
1 answer
58 views

Question about Problem $12$ in Chapter $11$ from Kibble & Berkshire's book

I write again the problem for convinience: A rigid rod of length $2a$ is suspended by two light, inextensible strings of length $l$ joining its ends to supports also a distance $2a$ apart and level ...
panos Physics's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

If the Lagrangian depends explicitly on time then the Hamiltonian is not conserved?

Why is the Hamiltonian not conserved when the Lagrangian has an explicit time dependence? What I mean is that it is very obvious to argue that if the Lagrangian has no an explicit time dependence $L=L(...
Spectree's user avatar
  • 227
1 vote
0 answers
59 views

Why is the conserved Lagrangian energy $E$ equal to the total energy in this example but not in a similar example? [duplicate]

I am aware that there exists duplicates to the title and have gone through the answers but it still doesn't answer my issue with a statement in the last image. These two similar situations with slight ...
Anonymousstriker38596's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
50 views

Potential energy with Taylor series for particle

I have been doing the following problem: Imagine we got a particle in $U(x)$ field and we need to consider the motion of the particle near $x=a$. It says to use Taylor series for $U(x)$ $U(x) = U(a) + ...
Giorgi's user avatar
  • 525
2 votes
1 answer
156 views

Differentiation of the on-shell action with respect to time

From the on-shell action, we derive the following two: $\frac{\partial S}{\partial t_1} = H(t_1)$, $\frac{\partial S}{\partial t_2} = -H(t_2)$, where $H = vp - L$ is the energy function. I have two ...
Giorgi's user avatar
  • 525
1 vote
4 answers
580 views

What is the difference between total energy and the Lagrangian energy function?

I am primarily looking for the difference in definitions to see how they differ. Given a Lagrangian $L(q_{j}, \dot{q}_{j}, t)$ of a system of finitely many particles, we may define (using Einstein ...
Maximal Ideal's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
78 views

Meaning of 2 kinetic energy terms in the equations

I have this problem (The two rods will be called links. Link 1 has length $a_1$ while link 2 has length $a_2$. The distance of the center of mass of each link to their respective joint is $l_i$): And ...
MIKE PAPADAKIS's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
77 views

Conservation of kinetic energy and external forces

In Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics", at page 360 below eq. (8.84) it is stated that: "If, further, there are no external forces on the system (monogenic and holonomic), ..., then $T$ ...
Matteo Menghini's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
136 views

Euler-Lagrange and Conservation of the Hamiltonian giving two different Equations of Motion

Consider the following Lagrangian: $$L=mR\left[\frac{1}{2}R\left(\dot{\theta}^2+\omega^{2}\sin^{2}\theta\right)+g\cos\theta\right],$$ with an associated Hamiltonian $$H=mR\left[\frac{1}{2}R\left(\dot{\...
MrStealYourFrog's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
88 views

Energy of a system executing forced oscillations

In L&L's textbook of Mechanics (Vol. 1 of the Course in Theoretical Physics) $\S 22$ Forced oscillations, one finds the following statement: \begin{equation} \xi = \dot{x} + i \omega x, \tag{22.9}...
Leonardo's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
689 views

Lagrangian intuition [duplicate]

I am new to lagrangian mechanics and it just baffles me the idea of subtracting potential energy from kinetic energy. Why don't we use kinetic energy alone and the least action path (between two ...
mohamed's user avatar
  • 105
1 vote
1 answer
103 views

Why Lagrangian is $L=\frac{1}{2}mv^2$ and not $mv^2$ for a free particle in an intertial frame? Both are proportional to the square of velocity

Landau writes the Lagrangian of a free particle in a second inertial frame as $$L(v'^{2})=L(v^2)+\frac{\partial L}{\partial v^2}2\textbf{v}\cdot{\epsilon},$$ and then it's written that the Lagrangian ...
Paolo Secchi's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
482 views

Central force motion and angular cyclic coordinates

(Goldstein 3rd edition pg 72) After reducing two-body problem to one-body problem We now restrict ourselves to conservative central forces, where the potential is $V(r)$ function of $r$ only, so that ...
Kashmiri's user avatar
  • 1,270
7 votes
2 answers
2k views

Example in motivation for Lagrangian formalism

I started reading Quantum Field Theory for the Gifted Amateur by Lancaster & Blundell, and I have a conceptual question regarding their motivation of the Lagrangian formalism. They start by ...
Aaron Daniel's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
537 views

Doubt in the expression of Lagrangian of a system [duplicate]

There is a problem given in Goldstein's Classical Mechanics Chapter-1 as 20. A particle of mass $\,m\,$ moves in one dimension such that it has the Lagrangian \begin{equation} L\boldsymbol{=}\...
Iti's user avatar
  • 436
1 vote
1 answer
64 views

How is kinetic energy $T$ given by $T=\dfrac{1}{2}\sum_{i}p_{i}\dot{q_{i}}$ in Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics?

Im going through a website teaching Hamiltonian mechanics and I know the below $$-\dot{p}_{i}=\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial q_{i}} \tag{14.3.12}$$ $$\dot{q}_{i}=\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial p_{i}} \tag{...
Kashmiri's user avatar
  • 1,270
3 votes
1 answer
113 views

Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation for scalars

I'm reading Chapter 11 (Normal Modes) of Classical Mechanics (5th ed.) by Berkshire and Kibble and came across this on pg. 253: The kinetic energy in terms in terms of the generalised coordinates is ...
Chern-Simons's user avatar
  • 1,047
0 votes
1 answer
237 views

Why is the energy function not always equal to total energy? [duplicate]

Why is the energy function $h = \dot{q_i}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}} - L $ not always equal to total energy $E = T + V$? Here $T$ is Kinetic Energy and $V$ is Potential Energy. I've read ...
dimes's user avatar
  • 75
1 vote
0 answers
129 views

Difference between eigenvalues of the potential energy Hessian vs. "generalized" eigenvalues with respect to a kinetic energy "metric"

Simple version Consider if we have a Lagrangian defined by $$L(q,\dot{q}) = \frac{1}{2} g_{ij}(q) \dot{q}^i \dot{q}^j - U(q) \tag{1a}$$ where the potential energy $U(q)$ has a single minimum at $q=0$ (...
Kai's user avatar
  • 3,710
12 votes
2 answers
2k views

Can the Lagrangian be written as a function of ONLY time?

The lagrangian is always phrased as $L(t,q,\dot{q})$. If you magically knew the equations $q(t)$ and $\dot{q}(t)$, could the Lagrangian ever be written only as a function of time? Take freefall for ...
novawarrior77's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
145 views

Is it possible to derive the equations of motion from the energy of a system alone, without knowing canonical coordinates or the Lagrangian?

Is it possible to derive the equations of motion from the energy of a system alone, without knowing canonical coordinates or the Lagrangian? I'm confused about which parts of the fundamental ...
poyi's user avatar
  • 21
3 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why is total kinetic energy always equal to the sum of rotational and translational kinetic energies?

My derivation is as follows. The total KE, $T_r$ for a rigid object purely rotating about an axis with angular velocity $\bf{ω}$ and with the $i$th particle rotating with velocity $ \textbf{v}_{(rot)...
user avatar
3 votes
4 answers
660 views

Misunderstanding in deriving Newton’s law from Euler-Lagrange equation

When deriving Newton’s law from Euler-Lagrange equation for a particle, the Lagrangian is defined as the kinetic energy minus the potential energy, but the problem is that the kinetic energy is ...
Ali Khalil's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
69 views

When the hamiltonian isn't equal to energy? [duplicate]

I have the following hamiltonian: $$H = \frac{p_1^2}{2}+\frac{(p_2-k\;q_2)^2}{2} ,\qquad k\in\mathbb{R}.$$ I know that the hamiltonian isnt explicitly dependent on time so $H$ is a motion ...
Ezequiel Saidman's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
109 views

von Neumann on the Hamiltonian

I'm reading von Neumann's book on QM and I'm slightly confused by a simple point. He writes, "The energy is a given function of the coordinates and their time derivatives: $E = L(q_1,..,q_k;\dot{q}...
user193319's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
147 views

Kinetic energy in Lagragian mechanics [duplicate]

In my classical mechanics class they asked why the kinetic energy for an holonomic mechanical system has the homogeneous quadratic form. Of course for a autonomous standard system( system that is ...
drandran12's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
69 views

Given the Lagrangian of a system, is there a way to extract the total energy?

If an object of mass $m$ is under the action of a conservative force and there are no constraints on the system, can $E=K+U$ be obtained? If yes, I am more interested if the answer could be ...
J. Ramos's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
59 views

Does $L=T-V$ still hold when $L$ is NOT time-dependent?

I am aware that the Lagrangian $L=T-V$ where $T$ is the kinetic energy and $V$ is the potential energy when $L$ depends on, for example, $r, \dot{r}, t$. My question is, does this still hold when the ...
Janitt's user avatar
  • 3
2 votes
1 answer
1k views

Difference between the energy and the Hamiltonian in a specific example

The problem is the following: Consider a particle of mass $m$ confined in a long and thin hollow pipe, which rotates in the $xy$ plane with constant angular velocity $\omega$. The rotation axis ...
Slayer147's user avatar
  • 1,045
2 votes
0 answers
104 views

Does the principle of least action assume the kinetic energy law as an axiom? [closed]

I should probably wait till I finish the complete derivation before asking this. but maybe it will help me to know ahead of time. I like to always know what the axiom's are before I start a topic and ...
user avatar

15 30 50 per page