On page 96 in "Local Covariant Operator Formalism of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories and Quark Confinement Problem", Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66 (1979) 1, KO state the following:
Finally we should comment on the current belief that the $U(1)$ problem was resolved by instanton. It is not correct; namely:, the instanton by itself cannot assure the unphysicalness of the $U(1)$ Goldstone boson $\chi$ which is contained in $J^{\mu}_5 $ because of the chiral $U(1)$ Ward identity ($ 7 \cdot 4$ ).No one has ever proved in the framework of "instanton physics" in a satisfactory manner that the $\chi$ really contained in the gauge-variant current $J^{\mu}_5$is not contained in the gauge-invariant one, $j^{\mu}_5$, although this problem has been discussed by many authors.
Are Kugo and Ojima correct? I thought 't Hooft proved that the instantons solved the $U(1)$ problem.