1
$\begingroup$

Is it the magnetic force ( F= qv +B ) or the electromagnetic force (F= q(E+vxB) that acts on the electrons of a conductor that is moving in a magnetic field? Thanks.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Are you specifically asking about conductors moving in a magnetic field, or are you asking about conductors in a circuit at rest, in the presence of no magnetic field? $\endgroup$
    – garyp
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 19:56

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

Let’s focus on force. Electric current in a wire is cause by net motion of electrons in the wire. The electrons move (in net, overall) due to the fundamental force known as electromagnetism, specifically the electrostatic attraction or repulsion between charged particles. That is the basis for electric fields and electric potential; those are just ways of characterizing and analyzing this attractive and/or repulsive force between charged particles/objects. In the simple situation you describe in your question, magnetism is not part of it. (Although in your answer to your own question, which was never really a question but a point to make, there is a situation where magnetism generates the current)

Coulomb’s law:

|Force| = k_e (|q1 q2|) / r^2

is the magnitude, and the direction is along a line between them, attractive if q1 and q2 have opposite sign. The constant k_e is called Coulomb's constant and is equal to 1/4πε0 , where ε0 is the electric constant; k_e = 8.988×109 N⋅m2⋅C−2.

From wikipedia “Electromagnetism is the force that acts between electrically charged particles. This phenomenon includes the electrostatic force acting between charged particles at rest, and the combined effect of electric and magnetic forces acting between charged particles moving relative to each other.”

Current flows parallel to the electric field, so even though net charge is moving, it is the former of the above two (electrical not magnetic) that does it. You need orthogonal (perpendicular) net motion of charges for magnetism to be involved.

$\endgroup$
18
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry it doesn't answer my question. What do you think about the right hand rule? The rule that describes a current carrying conductor moving across a mangetic field. What is that force that the thumb represents? The force acting on the conductor itself as in a mtor in your drill? And is a generator the reverse of the motor? Instead of current in the wire, you are moving the conductor itself? I don't think I made my point clear in the post nor here. Because I just repeated myself. $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 1:51
  • $\begingroup$ No problem. Will help if can. This is what i answered: “So is the cause of current in conductors due to magnetic force or electromotive force?” Also the title is “what force moves electrons through a conductor?” The right hand rule gives the magnetic field caused by moving charges, moving charges such as current in a wire. But you seem to be asking what makes charges (like electrons) move in a conductor (?) $\endgroup$
    – Al Brown
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 2:43
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't want to do this but well it is the only way. It is to make comments on your main comment. Since I am allowed only so many characters I have to split it up. First: "Electric current in a wire is cause by electrons moving in the wire". This is false. Electric current is not caused by electrons moving in a wire. Electrons moving in a wire is electric current. Big difference. So it is not the cause of it. It is like saying walking is caused by someone walking. Not good. $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ Electric current is not equivalent to electrons moving the length of the wire. Electric current IS caused by electrons moving in a wire (“diffusion of free electrons” is a type of “electrons moving” which causes electric current). $\endgroup$
    – Al Brown
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 18:39
  • $\begingroup$ Quoting your from you quoting it from wikipedia: " The electrons move due to the fundamental force known as electromagnetism". And how this electromagnetism is a combined effect between moving charged particle. Do you actually see that it is not the cause of current but electromagnetism being an effect of moving charges. You did not read wikipedia correctly. Right? $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 18:43
0
$\begingroup$

The force doing work on electrons in a conductor is always an electric force $\vec{F}=q\vec{E}$. Magnetic forces can do no work since $\vec{F}=q(\vec{v}\times\vec{B})$ is always perpendicular to the velocity $\vec{v}$.

One thing to remember is that EMF is calculated at one particular instant, and is NOT the same as the work done on a physical charge as it moves through the conductor. To calculate the EMF, you take a snapshot of the situation, compute the integral $\varepsilon = \oint{\vec{f}\cdot d\vec{r}}$, where $\vec{f}=\vec{F}/q$ is the "force per unit charge" on the electron at that instant in time. Don't think of this as a work integral, because to calculate the work, you need information about the actual motion of the electrons and the forces that act on them as they move. You don't use that information to compute the EMF. In practice, for most situations you can think of $\vec{f}$ as and electric field $\vec{E}$, which is comprised of two contributions:

(1) a conservative part $\vec{E}_c$ which satisfies $\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{E}_c=0$, or equivalently (by Stokes theorem) $\oint{\vec{E}_{c}\cdot d\vec{r}}=0$.

(2) a nonconservative part $\vec{E}_{nc}$ which has nonzero curl: $\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{E}_{nc} \ne 0$. The nonconservative electric field in a generator arises due to a time-dependent magnetic field (in the rest frame of the conducting electron.) It has $\oint{\vec{E}_{nc}\cdot d\vec{r}}\ne 0$ and leads to an EMF.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ That is my point. Although they define emf as work done on charge, never mind that some say it is not a force either, while its measurement is in terms of work. It is qBL. It is just the number of chargs with respect to time and magnetic field flux. And magnetic force is again the same except it refers to the force per unit of charge with respect to time and strength of the field. The force being orthogonal doesn't do the work. Voltage is induced by "induction". Energy moves at far greater velocity than charges.....but that is another story. $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ And for the life me I still don't know how energy moves in electrical system. I can only assume and use the term near-field propagation.. $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ By the time frame of non-conducting electrons, do you mean the electrons that are not yet in the conduction band? So it is viewing the conduction band electrons as moving and dissapating heat or? And by conservative E do you mean to say that charges want to even out and remove potential difference caused by all the stuff we did to them, messing with them, applying energy? $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ Editing: By the rest frame of the electrons you mean the electrons which are not yet moving in the conduction band seeing the electrons moving in the conduction band ? $\endgroup$
    – user232620
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 21:09
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not taking any quantum mechanics into account here, so no conduction band or fermi level comes into play in my explanation. By "rest frame" of the electron, I just mean the reference frame co-moving with the charge. Are you familiar with the idea that magnetic fields and electric fields transform into each other under Lorentz transformation? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 21:43