It is zero (provided your diagram is an idealized circuit, meaning the resistance of connecting wires are zero), that is, there is not potential difference between point A and B.
Current flows from higher potential to lower potential is the fact.
How do you conclude that current cannot flow if there is NO potential difference?
You simply don't / you can't conclude.
From a logic theory point of view, how do you argue this conclusion?
Consider the proposition.
- IF there is a potential difference, THEN the current flows.
This is an IF THEN statement, and this particular instance where IF statement is wrong to start with, is called Ex-Falso Quodlibet in deduction logic. What it means is since the starting IF statement itself is wrong /FALSE, the followup THEN statement is always TRUE.
Current flows when there is a potential difference, DOES NOT mean current doesn't flow when there is NO potential difference. As a matter of fact a better statement that expresses this fact would be,
Current flows across a resistor ONLY when there is a potential difference, and the direction of flow is taken to be from higher potential to lower, by convention.
From this it is clear that you don't necessarily require a potential difference for current to flow, when you don't have any resistance.