Given a pure state $|\psi\rangle$ with position wavefunction $x\mapsto\psi(x)$, define its Wigner function as $$f_\psi(x,p) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int dy e^{-iyp} \psi(x+y/2)\psi^*(x-y/2) \equiv \frac{1}{2\pi}\int dy e^{-iyp}\tilde f_\psi(x,y),$$ where the last expression highlights that this is the Fourier transform of $\tilde f_\psi(x,y)\equiv \psi(x+y/2)\psi^*(x-y/2)$.
As far as I understand, if $|\psi\rangle$ is eigenstate of $H$ with energy $E$, i.e. $H|\psi\rangle=E|\psi\rangle$ and $H(\mathfrak x,\mathfrak p)\psi=E\psi$ (here $\mathfrak{x,p}$ denote the operators corresponding to $x,p$), then $H\star f_\psi=Ef_\psi$. On the other hand, if $(x,p)\mapsto f(x,p)$ is a real function such that $H\star f=E f$, then $f$ is the Wigner function of some state $\psi$ such that $H(\mathfrak x,\mathfrak p)\psi=E\psi$.
This is shown in (Curtright, Fairlie, Zachos, 2014) (Link to pdf), lemma 0.3, for the case of $H(x,p)=\frac12 p^2+V(x)$. I am, however, struggling to understand the proof that if $H\star f=Ef$ then $f$ is the Wigner of an eigenstate of $H$.
Writing $f$ via its Fourier transform as $f(x,p)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int dy e^{-iyp} \tilde f(x,y)$, and using the identities $$(f\star g)(x,p) = f\left(x + \frac{i}{2}\partial_p, p - \frac{i}{2}\partial_x\right)g(x,p) = f(x,p) g\left(x - \frac{i}{2}\partial_p^L, p + \frac{i}{2}\partial_x^L\right),$$ we have $$(H\star f)(x,p) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int dy \, H\Big(x +\frac{y}{2}, p-\frac{i}{2}\partial_x\Big) e^{-iyp}\tilde f(x,y),$$ $$(f\star H)(x,p) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int dy \, H\Big(x -\frac{y}{2}, p+\frac{i}{2}\partial_x\Big) e^{-iyp}\tilde f(x,y).$$ I don't quite see how the conclusion is reached from this. In the treatment in the link above the authors seem to replace $p\to i\partial_y$, which however I'm not sure how to make sense of. Sure, if $\partial_y$ only acts on the exponential then $i\partial_y e^{-iyp}=pe^{-iyp}$, but why isn't the $y$ dependence of $\tilde f$ taken into consideration here?
Even granted the above replacement, we would reach the condition $$\int dy\, \left[H\left(x\pm\frac{y}{2},i\partial_y\mp\frac{i}{2}\partial_x\right) -E \right]e^{-iyp}\tilde f(x,p) = 0.$$ Why does this imply that $\tilde f(x,y) = \psi^*(x-y/2)\psi(x+y/2)$ for some $\psi$ eigenstate of $H$?