Skip to main content

Questions tagged [teleology]

The tag has no usage guidance.

0 votes
1 answer
51 views

How does viewing all human creations as 'corporations' align with or challenge existing philosophical frameworks?

I propose defining a 'corporation' as 'a framework around an idea that seeks to continue to exist given parameters.' This definition seems to encompass all human creations, from self to language to ...
Corporate Entity's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
100 views

Does the universe have an ultimate purpose? [closed]

Objective purpose is an alternative? Universal, fundamental purpose?
Meanach's user avatar
  • 2,341
6 votes
2 answers
216 views

Way to find a middle ground between functionalism and "panpsychism"?

Scientifically, given that we are just pieces of universe (earth), then parts of the universe can experience phenomenal consciousness. "Panpsychism" says that therefore phenomenality must be ...
Yop's user avatar
  • 117
0 votes
0 answers
13 views

Kant's "interpret them as divine commands" remark

I was thinking about the idea of teleological/natural-law ethics as founded in the will of a divine power, and I thought that there would be (A) a purpose that this power had set for Itself alongside (...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
31 views

If we used √OB and √𝓐 operations, could we have a demi-is/demi-ought proposition that bridged full "is" with full "ought"?

The insight that the teleological ethicist seems to have is that final causality is a type of the moral law in the Kantian sense (from the second Critique): ... the moral law has no faculty but the ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
74 views

Does the Introduction of Teleology into Ethical Discourse Solve Hume's Is/Ought Problem?

For Hume, no one could describe objective reasons for thinking that a man ought to do something generally, becuase there was no way to derive an ought from an is. But, if a classical view of causality ...
jaredad7's user avatar
  • 165
1 vote
1 answer
182 views

What is a functional relationship?

By a "functional relationship" I mean "the way" a part of a system interacts with the rest of the system. In a certain sense it "doesn't matter" how the part of the ...
causative's user avatar
  • 14.6k
0 votes
2 answers
59 views

How to understand "type-which-corresponds-to"?

In the comment on How do we define this?, user g s wrote a deleted comment indicating that things could be defined using "type-which-corresponds-to" (exact quote from memory). They followed ...
Stack Exchange Supports Israel's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
53 views

Could deities/multiverses be the empty/trivial solutions to, "How and why does our universe exist in the way it does?"

Note: I am loosely following Nicholas Rescher (Axiogenesis) here, by qualifying "the existence of this world" as "the existence of this specific world," where, "Why is there ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
580 views

Are only human beings capable of rationally intentional acts?

Max Horkheimer's 1947 book The Eclipse of Reason argued that over the course of history, the conception of reason shifted from the objective - the Greek idea that reason qua logos governs the Cosmos - ...
Wayfarer's user avatar
  • 604
2 votes
2 answers
574 views

What's the difference between teleology and teleonomy?

So, Teleology is According to the Cambridge Dictionary: the belief that everything has a special purpose or use According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary: a doctrine (as in vitalism) that ends ...
Swike's user avatar
  • 129
1 vote
1 answer
523 views

What is the difference between anti-teleology and deontology?

In regards to ethical positions, what is anti-teleology, and how is it different from deontology? Are they opposites or is their relationship of another sort?
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
50 views

The philosophical analysis of creating and implementing good ideas?

There are projects with great ideas, but poor implementation; and there are mediocre ideas, but are well implemented. What sort of philosophy and which philosophers, if any, address this phenomenon?
Ha'Penny's user avatar
  • 149
0 votes
1 answer
52 views

Natural purposes vs. right actions

Consider the following thought experiment: Since he was born, Sam has had an extra organ in his body, let's call it a quirble. Whenever Sam does something objectively wrong, even if he doesn't know ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
243 views

What is the difference between control exerted by an agent and causation?

I have my own thoughts about this. Am I on the right track or is there some real philosophy that defines the concept of control differently? In a regular cause & effect scenario the cause ...
Pertti Ruismäki's user avatar

15 30 50 per page