Timeline for My question has been put on hold citing a rule that I think I haven't broken. Is there any way to appeal the decision?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019 at 18:31 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @DánielKis-Nagy, thanks. This is surprising because the script reads the info from the timeline data. I would have thought that if you can see the timeline, and see the review results directly, there wouldn't be anything in the script requiring higher permissions. It looks like for some reason the user needs review privileges for the script to see the review results. Appreciate your checking. | |
| Jul 18, 2019 at 14:44 | comment | added | Dániel Kis-Nagy | @fixer1234 I have added the userscript you suggested, and it says this: "A reopen review has been found Any existing votes will not be reset by future edits. Status could not be determined because you do not have review privileges." The link to the reopen review works, and I am able to view it with my current rep. | |
| Jul 18, 2019 at 14:41 | comment | added | Dániel Kis-Nagy | @fixer1234 I can view the timeline, yes | |
| Jul 18, 2019 at 5:53 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Also, we're not sure what rep is required to view the timeline on a question. This is a link for yours: superuser.com/posts/1456112/timeline. Are you able to view that? Thanks for your help. | |
| Jul 18, 2019 at 5:53 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Dániel, can you help us test something? You weren't aware of the reopen review on your question. We've created a user script to allow people to see that, but we don't know what minimum privilege level is needed for it to work. We know that some level is required because it doesn't work if you aren't logged in. Your rep is still relatively low on SU. Could you load the script and see if it works for you? It's described here: Announcement: New Functionality. (cont'd) | |
| Jul 8, 2019 at 7:45 | vote | accept | Dániel Kis-Nagy | ||
| Jul 8, 2019 at 0:02 | answer | added | Rob | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 21:54 | answer | added | fixer1234 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 19:55 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Jul 7, 2019 at 19:43 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jul 7, 2019 at 19:31 | comment | added | gparyani | Do note that questions that are edited shortly after being put on hold are placed in a review queue to consider them for potential reopening. In this case, it was reviewed, but the reviewers decided not to reopen it. | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 19:27 | comment | added | rene | From the On-topic page of super user: and it is not about …cell phones or smart phones and that seems to be the core of your question. | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 19:19 | history | asked | Dániel Kis-Nagy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |