Timeline for My question has been put on hold citing a rule that I think I haven't broken. Is there any way to appeal the decision?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 at 17:35 | comment | added | gparyani | @DánielKis-Nagy Worth noting that over on Meta Stack Exchange, we're discussing how to resolve issue 1. Your opinion is appreciated: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/323786/… | |
| Jul 8, 2019 at 7:45 | vote | accept | Dániel Kis-Nagy | ||
| Jul 8, 2019 at 7:45 | comment | added | Dániel Kis-Nagy | Thanks! I'm fine with my question not being reopened now that I see that (1) it actually was reconsidered (2) there was a good reason for it to be put on hold. I think the main source of confusion for me was that citing a single rule gave me an impression that that's the only serious issue with my question, but now I understand that that's a limitation of the system. | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 22:30 | comment | added | Burgi | Wikipedia suggests that it is "NokiaOS 2.5.1" but that appears to just be a codename. Maybe some flavour of Symbian? | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 22:00 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 234 characters in body
|
| Jul 7, 2019 at 21:54 | history | answered | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |