4
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an $\infty$-topos and let $A$ be an abelian group object of the category $\operatorname{Disc}(\mathcal{X})$ of discrete objects of $X$. Recall that a morphism $f:\widetilde{X}\to X$ of $\mathcal{X}$ is called an $n$-gerbe banded by $A$ if $f$ is both $n$-truncated and $n$-connective, and there is a (preferred) isomorphism $\pi_n(f)\cong A\times \widetilde{X}$ of group objects of $\operatorname{Disc}(\mathcal{X}_{/\widetilde{X}})$. (For safety, I will take $n\geq 2$.) For example, the base point $u:1\to K(A,n+1)$ and the projection $K(A,n)\to 1$ are both $n$-gerbes banded by $A$.

In $\S$ 7.2.2 of Higher Topos Theory, Lurie constructs an $\infty$-category $\operatorname{Gerb}_n^A(\mathcal{X})$ of $n$-gerbes in $\mathcal{X}$ banded by $A$, and claims that the object $u:1\to K(A,n+1)$ is terminal in $\operatorname{Gerb}_n^A(\mathcal{X})$. I do not understand his argument, and I need someone's help.

His argument goes as follows:

Let $f:\widetilde{X}\to X$ be an $n$-gerbe banded by $A$ (equipped with a preferred isomrphism $\pi_n(f)\cong A\times \widetilde{X}$). We wish to show that $\operatorname{Map}_{\operatorname{Gerb}_n^A(\mathcal{X})}(f,u)$ is contractible. He then says that "this assertion is local on $X$," so we may assume that $f$ is the trivial $n$-gerbe $X\times K(A,n)\to X$. Under this reduction, the claim has already been proved in a separate lemma (7.2.2.25), and so we are done.

Here is what I do not understand. What does he mean when he says that the assertion is local? It suggests a picture in which every $n$-gerbe banded by $A$ is sort of a colimit of trivial gerbes. This is true, say, when $\mathcal{X}=\mathcal{S}_{/K}$ is the $\infty$-topos of spaces over a fixed space $K$; but I am completely lost for general $\mathcal{X}$. Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know what Lurie has in mind, but I think what you have to use is that $f : \widetilde X \to X$ is an effective epimorphism, and that the pullback of the gerbe along $f$ is trivial. Perhaps the picture becomes clearer if you work with an internal mapping object in place of this $\mathrm{Map}_{\mathrm{Gerb}_n^A(\mathcal X)}(f,u)$. Then you end up using the facts that pullback along effective epimorphisms reflects equivalences and that pushforward preserves equivalences. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 13 at 10:59
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidWärn Thanks! That sounds promising. Can you elaborate on why the pullback of $f$ along $f$ is trivial? $\endgroup$
    – Ken
    Commented Apr 14 at 0:42
  • $\begingroup$ The pullback of $f$ along itself is trivial because it has a section (the diagonal of $f$) and any gerbe with a section is trivial (by Proposition 7.2.2.12) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 14 at 6:40
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidWärn Ah, it was that easy. Thank you! If you can turn your comments into an answer, I will gladly accept it. (If you prefer not to, don't bother; I will post an answer as a community wiki just to mark this question answered.) $\endgroup$
    – Ken
    Commented Apr 14 at 10:16

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

(Turning my comments into an answer.)

The relevant claim is an assertion about a gerbe $f : \widetilde X \to X$. (Namely, the assertion that the mapping space $\mathrm{Map}_{\mathrm{Gerb}^A_n(\mathcal X)}(f,u)$ is contractible.) Lurie writes that this assertion "is local on $X$". I believe what is meant is that if $p : X' \to X$ is an arbitrary effective epimorphism, and the assertion holds for the pullback $p^* f : X' \times_X \widetilde X \to X'$ of the gerbe $f$ along $p$, then the assertion holds for $f$.

Admitting that the assertion is indeed local on $X$ in this sense, we reduce to the case of a trivial gerbe as follows. For $p$, we take the effective epimorphism $f : \widetilde X \to X$. This is assumed to be $n$-connective, so it is a fortiori an effective epimorphism. I claim that the pullback $f^* f: \widetilde X \times_X \widetilde X \to \widetilde X$ is the trivial gerbe $\widetilde X \times K(A,n)\to \widetilde X$. By Proposition 7.2.2.12 (3), applied to the slice $\mathcal X / \widetilde X$, any gerbe with a section is trivial, so it suffices to produce a section. We are done as the diagonal map $\widetilde X \to \widetilde X \times_X \widetilde X$ is a section.

$\endgroup$