Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
590 views

Show that a set of connectives {∨, ∧} through structural induction is not a complete set of connectives

I understand how a set of connectives such as {∨,∧,¬}, can be considered adequate, but I'm not fully understanding how one would go proving something that is not adequate The full problem is as ...
user297138's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
2k views

CNF formula induction proof

I am trying to prove the following theorem: Every proposition formula is logically equivalent to a formula in CNF. As a hint, they say that this can by proven by an induction on the structure of the ...
dpalma's user avatar
  • 297
0 votes
2 answers
42 views

Formalized attempt of proof that well ordered-ness ( of subsets of $\mathbb{Z}$ that are bounded below) implies induction seems to have issue?

I want to prove that well-orderedness on the integers implies induction. The proof is the classical "assume a contradiction" and see what happens. So begin with an intended contradiction: \begin{...
bzm3r's user avatar
  • 2,652
2 votes
1 answer
271 views

Predicated needed for proof using structural induction

I have a set, $F$, of boolean formulas defined inductively as follows: $X_{i} \in F, \: \forall i \in \mathbb{N} \: \text{(variables)}\\ A \in F \implies \neg A \in F\\ A, B \in F \implies A \land B \...
Schemer's user avatar
  • 125
2 votes
1 answer
688 views

Structural Induction, Propostitonal formulae problem

I am kind of overwhelmed by this question. Can anyone give me some hints about where to start? Propositional formulae PF are inductively defined over the Boolean constants B := {1, 0} (true and ...
TonyH's user avatar
  • 23
1 vote
1 answer
184 views

Need help finding a proof strategy for a propositional logic theorem

Textbook is Ben-Ari's Mathematical Logic for Computer Science. This question is taken directly from the homework that my professor assigned, not from the textbook. Definitions of interpretations and ...
Keith Yong's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
135 views

Readings on more general/abstract notions of induction related to logic

Can someone suggest references to understand the more general/abstract concept of induction? Specifically, I am trying to justify to myself what is called induction on the "complexity of a formula" ...
Ishfaaq's user avatar
  • 10.1k
6 votes
1 answer
2k views

How to prove Post's Theorem by induction?

The proof of post's theorem is given in my textbook in two pages of explanation using a non-induction method. I was told that ,using induction on length of the proof, one can get a simpler and more ...
Jecht Tyre's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
555 views

Proof by induction of propositional formulas

I have two inductively defined operations: $\text{bin}$ base case: If $p$ is a propositional letter, then $\text{bin}(p) = 0$ inductive step $\text{bin}(\neg \phi) = \text{bin} (\phi)$ $\text{...
Garth Marenghi's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
3k views

Can mathematical induction be used to disprove something?

I saw this to be the rule of inference for mathematical induction : Now consider : as L.H.S. and as R.H.S.. Now if suppose, while trying to prove P(k) -> P(k+1), in the left hand side of the ...
Amit Tomar's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
1k views

Using induction to prove universality of gate

Can we use induction to prove gate(like NAND) is universal. If so how?
user2179293's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
296 views

Proof through induction that all formulas with a certain characteristic are a tautology or logical equivalence of p

First, sorry for the long title but I couldn't figure out how to summarize it better. This is a homework question for my course "Introduction to Logic" and I can't figure out how to solve it. The ...
markus_p's user avatar
  • 163
6 votes
2 answers
6k views

Induction proof for the lengths of well-formed formulas (wffs)

Use induction to show that there are no wffs of length 2, 3, or 6, but that any other positive length is possible. The wffs in question are those associated with sentential/propositional logic. So, ...
Derrek Whistle's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
258 views

Structural Induction: Base case leads to a contradiction

To make my question clear, I will start with some definitions and notation from the book I am studying: Definition: A function $\theta$ from the set of formulas into the set of formulas is a ...
Code-Guru's user avatar
  • 2,176
2 votes
3 answers
992 views

How to prove this with induction

$$(P_0 \lor P_1 \lor P_2\lor\ldots\lor P_n) \rightarrow Q $$ is the same as $$(P_0 \rightarrow Q) \land (P_1 \rightarrow Q) \land (P_2 \rightarrow Q) \land\ldots\land(P_n \rightarrow Q)$$ Do I ...
user60862's user avatar
  • 503

15 30 50 per page