Skip to main content

All Questions

6 votes
1 answer
2k views

How to prove Post's Theorem by induction?

The proof of post's theorem is given in my textbook in two pages of explanation using a non-induction method. I was told that ,using induction on length of the proof, one can get a simpler and more ...
Jecht Tyre's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
6k views

Induction proof for the lengths of well-formed formulas (wffs)

Use induction to show that there are no wffs of length 2, 3, or 6, but that any other positive length is possible. The wffs in question are those associated with sentential/propositional logic. So, ...
Derrek Whistle's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
100 views

Proof swapping logical connectors transforms tautology to contradiction

I was given the following exercise: For a formula $ϕ$ built up using the connectives ¬,∧,∨, let $ϕ^∗$ be constructed by swapping all ∧ by ∨ and viceversa (e.g. $ϕ=p_1 \lor \neg p_1$, $ϕ^*=p_1 \land \...
Alexander's user avatar
  • 355
5 votes
1 answer
157 views

Can we prove "induction on wffs" in a non-circular way?

I've always had the question of whether formal logic, number theory, or set theory "comes first" in foundations, and I've seen questions asking this. However, I recently came to what I think ...
Maximal Ideal's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

Proof of Principle of Duality: Show that $φ$' is logically equivalent to $¬φ$

Could anyone check if my proof is ok/ suggest any improvement please? I couldn't find a way to utilise the induction hypothesis so I am not sure if this is ok. Let $φ$ be a formula built up using ...
Constantly confused's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
13k views

I want a clear explanation for the Principle of Strong Mathematical Induction

I understood the Principle of Mathematical Induction. I know how to make a recursive definition. But I am stuck with how the "Principle of Strong Mathematical Induction (- the Alternative Form)" ...
malhobayyeb's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
169 views

Length of the well formed formula $(((p_0)\rightarrow ((p_1)∧(p_{32}))) \rightarrow ((((p_{13})∧(p_6))∨(p_{317})) \rightarrow (p_{26})))$

How is the length of this well formed formula defined as $5$? $\big(((p_{0})\rightarrow ((p_1) \land (p_{32}))) \rightarrow ((((p_{13}) \land (p_6)) \lor (p_{317})) \rightarrow (p_{26}))).$ (from ...
Avi123's user avatar
  • 99
3 votes
1 answer
190 views

Substitution of formula in propositional logic.

I have a question about something in the book "Mathematical logic for Computer Science". I will post something from the book, where I have highlighted what I do not understand, after I have ...
user394334's user avatar
  • 1,262
3 votes
1 answer
90 views

Are there any strong forms of "clamped" induction?

So in normal induction, we say that if $P(a)$ is true, and $P(n)\implies P(n+1)$, then $P(n)$ is true $\forall n\geq a$. Then we have strong induction where you assume all preceeding values of the ...
wjmccann's user avatar
  • 3,055
3 votes
2 answers
114 views

Proof by induction of inadequacy of a propositional connective

I have the following truth table of a newly defined logical operator and have to prove its functional incompleteness via structural induction. My idea is that that you cannot express the always true ...
Johoey's user avatar
  • 51
2 votes
3 answers
992 views

How to prove this with induction

$$(P_0 \lor P_1 \lor P_2\lor\ldots\lor P_n) \rightarrow Q $$ is the same as $$(P_0 \rightarrow Q) \land (P_1 \rightarrow Q) \land (P_2 \rightarrow Q) \land\ldots\land(P_n \rightarrow Q)$$ Do I ...
user60862's user avatar
  • 503
2 votes
1 answer
185 views

What is the problem with this proof of the PMI?

Principle of Mathematical Induction (PMI). Let $P(n)$ be a statement depending on some $n\in \mathbb{N}$. Suppose that $P(1)$ is true and that $P(n)$ true implies $P(n+1)$ true for each $n\in \mathbb{...
Alphie's user avatar
  • 4,827
2 votes
1 answer
67 views

Show that $A_1,...,A_n\vDash_{taut} B \leftrightarrow \vDash_{taut} A_1 \to A_2\to ...\to A_n\to B$

I'm having a hard time understanding the iff part of this proof by induction (is this vacuously true?), below is my attempt: Base Case: Let $n = 1$, therefore $A_1\vDash_{taut} B \leftrightarrow \...
Elliott de Launay's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
145 views

How to prove? Propositional Calculus

I'm having trouble proving this: Let $\alpha$ be a wff such that the only possible connectives in it are $\lnot, \land, \lor$. Let $\alpha^{\ast}$ be the result of changing every $\land$ in $\alpha$ ...
Jon's user avatar
  • 1,225
2 votes
1 answer
688 views

Structural Induction, Propostitonal formulae problem

I am kind of overwhelmed by this question. Can anyone give me some hints about where to start? Propositional formulae PF are inductively defined over the Boolean constants B := {1, 0} (true and ...
TonyH's user avatar
  • 23

15 30 50 per page