Skip to main content

All Questions

4 votes
0 answers
87 views

(When) are recursive "definitions" definitions?

This is a "soft" question, but I'm greatly interested in canvassing opinions on it. I don't know whether there is anything like a consensus on the answer. Under what conditions (if any) are ...
ac2357's user avatar
  • 93
0 votes
1 answer
287 views

Set theory and model theory: which set is ZFC?

I have yet another post about what is model theory doing and why is it valid; I hope I can be coherent. (1) https://mathoverflow.net/questions/23060/set-theory-and-model-theory (2) What exactly is the ...
Riley Moriss's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
319 views

How should one understand the "universe of sets"?

One way to understand the axioms of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ is to see them as a describing the "universe of sets" $V$, together with the "true membership relation" $\in$. The universe $V$ ...
Joe's user avatar
  • 20.7k
5 votes
2 answers
207 views

Introductory text on logic for those interested in the intersection of logic, algebra, and topology?

I'm a current MA student doing research in formal semantics, which is an application of, among other things, logic and model theory to the study of the semantics of natural languages. I'd like to ...
m. lekk's user avatar
  • 380
0 votes
1 answer
170 views

What are the merits of having a "good" proof system?

Background: My understanding is that model-theoretic semantics (MTS) and proof-theoretic semantics (PTS) differ in the following ways. In MTS, you first define the notion of truth in models and then ...
user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
604 views

Do the everyday mathematician and the model theorist mean the same thing by "truth"?

In Terrence Tao's book Analysis I, the axioms of ZFC are considered to be true statements, and every other true statement in the book is proved from these axioms. Model theory is not mentioned. This ...
simple jack's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
85 views

Clarification needed in Definability versus Leibnizian structure chapter on Hamkins's book

In Lectures on the Philosophy of Mathematics, chapter 1, 1.10 Structuralism, there is the sentence: For example, the real ordered field $<\mathbb{R},+,·,<,0,1>$ is Leibnizian, since for any ...
Eduard's user avatar
  • 304
2 votes
1 answer
504 views

Concrete and abstract models of axiomatic systems

In order to prove the consistency of an axiomatic system we must come up with a model. Wikipedia gives the following definition for a model of an axiomatic system: A model for an axiomatic system is ...
ado sar's user avatar
  • 256
1 vote
0 answers
125 views

Universal quantifier over an uncountable set

To prove that a segment has the same number of points with half a segment one might say that one can find a bijective function mapping every point from the segment to the half segment. Let' say: $$\...
user3685604's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
242 views

What's the connection between the homomorphism theorem in Enderton "A mathematical Intro to Logic" and Lyndon’s Positivity Theorem?

In Enderton p. 96, the homomorphism theorem implies (I state only the essential): Let $h:\cal{A} \rightarrow {\cal B}$ be an epimorphism (i.e., a surjective homomorphism). For any sentence $\alpha$ ...
Dominic108's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
364 views

How do models determine truth values if the external theory is incomplete?

I'm currently learning model theory from Chang and Kiesler's Model Theory: 3rd edition. Something about the basic relationship between syntax and semantics is troubling me. The book describes ...
Franklin Pezzuti Dyer's user avatar
17 votes
4 answers
1k views

In classical predicate logics, why is it usually assumed that at least one object exists?

In classical predicate logic it is commonly assumed that the domain of objects is non-empty. This validates inferences such as $$\forall x Fx \models \exists x Fx$$ as well as, if the identity ...
Max's user avatar
  • 402
0 votes
2 answers
259 views

Formal or informal definability of the standard model of natural numbers

I started a discussion in comments to this answer, but it grew beyond what fits comments, so I'm promoting it to this separate question. Here is a recap: $\Large\color{green}{\unicode{0x2BA9}}\,$ The ...
Vladimir Reshetnikov's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
212 views

Is there a modal logic axiom corresponding to the condition that for every world w there is some world v such that vRw? (Reverse Seriality)

Seriality on certain modal frames - that for every world w there is some world v such that wRv - corresponds to the axiom: $\square$P$\rightarrow$$\diamondsuit$P, assuming a standard interpretation of ...
John Beverley's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
734 views

Is an interpretation just a homomorphism between theories?

I don't understand model theory, but I think I've read enough about it that I can pretend to by parroting the language of model theorists. So instead of asking "how does model theory work," I'm going ...
R. Burton's user avatar
  • 5,040

15 30 50 per page