Skip to main content

All Questions

4 votes
0 answers
56 views

Prove for a monotone, continuous, and rational preference relation $\succsim$ on $X=\mathbb{R}^L_+$, $y\geq x$ implies $y\succsim x$.

I need to prove the following result: For a monotone, continuous, complete, and transitive preference relation $\succsim$ on $X=\mathbb{R}^L_+$, $y\geq x$ implies $y\succsim x$. I tried it myself, ...
Champa's user avatar
  • 41
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Is the defintion given of a Hasse diagram correct?

I am currently reading Proofs: A Long Form Mathematics Textbook written by Jay Cummings, and am on the section about Partial Orders. When discussing how to visualize a POSET he defines a Hasse diagram ...
Skinny Kevin's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
28 views

If $R$ is a partial order and $a,b$ are incomparable, then the transitive closure of $R\cup\{(a,b)\}$ is antisymmetric

Claim: Let $T_0$ be the transitive closure of $R\cup\{(a,b)\}$. Then $T_0$ is antisymmetric. Proof. Note that since $R$ is transitive, $x T_0 y$ means that $x R a, b R y$ or $x R y$. Suppose $x T_0 y\...
curiousCprogrammer1231's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
32 views

Is there a name for this ordering on integer vectors?

Let $\mathbf{k} \in \mathbb{[n]}^{u}$ be $u$-dimensional arrays, where $[n] = \{0,1,\dots,n\}$. Now let us assume that $\mathbf{k}$ are generated under $u$ nested for loops running from 0 to n. For ...
SagarM's user avatar
  • 1,799
0 votes
1 answer
47 views

I seek for a short and rigorous way to extend an embedding of a partial order into $\mathbb{Q}$

Let $(X,\leq ) $ be a partial order and $A$ be a proper subset of $X$ and $t\in X\setminus A$. Knowing that there exists an order-preserving map $\varphi :A\rightarrow \mathbb{Q}$ whose range is ...
boyler's user avatar
  • 375
0 votes
0 answers
31 views

Property of magnitude proof

Is there a way to prove that: If x < y and y = z, then x < z I am trying to write a proof for my class but am currently limited to using Euclid's Common Notions and the Axioms for the Real ...
Arasnsv's user avatar
  • 11
2 votes
1 answer
142 views

Down-sets of a finite ordered set are down Max.

The following exercise comes from the book: Introduction to Lattices and order (second edition, B. A. Davey, H.A. Priestley). Problem 1.14, pag. 27. Let $P$ be a finite oredered set. (1) Show that $Q=\...
Ixion's user avatar
  • 1,278
1 vote
1 answer
87 views

Verifying Proof: If $L$ is a poset with a bottom element, and $\exists \sup(S)$ for every subset $S \subset L$, then $L$ is a complete lattice

I am currently working through Kaplansky for self study and was hoping to get some feedback on this proof. I would appreciate comments on clarity and legability as well. Claim: If $L$ is a poset with ...
EmbarrassingQuestions's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
87 views

Prove that $\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{G}$ is the glb of the set $\{\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G}\}$

I want to refer to Exercise 26 part (c) of Section 4.6 of Velleman's 2nd Edition book. The exercise is as follows: Supose $A$ is a set. If $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are partitions of $A$, then ...
Alex Ruiz's user avatar
  • 338
0 votes
1 answer
50 views

How to prove this is a partial order? [closed]

A relation is defined by: $x\leq y$ if and only if there exists $𝑘\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $y= x+5k$. Prove that $\leq$ is a partial order. I have no idea how to do this question. I've tried my best ...
math101's user avatar
  • 11
1 vote
2 answers
419 views

Lowest upper bound of a family of sets

I refer to Exercise 23 of Section 4.4 of Velleman's 2nd edition book. It's also Theorem 4.4.11 in the Section. This post is not a duplicate of this (I include the posts that are mentioned there). I ...
Alex Ruiz's user avatar
  • 338
4 votes
1 answer
267 views

Exercise 8.5.13 Terence Tao's Analysis 1

Background I am trying to prove a lemma in Terence Tao's Analysis 1 which is used to prove the statement below. Let $X$ be a partially ordered set with ordering relation $\leq$, and let $x_0$ be an ...
Herb's user avatar
  • 339
5 votes
1 answer
262 views

Prove that the least upper bound of $\mathcal F$ is $\bigcup\mathcal F$ and the greatest lower bound of $\mathcal F$ is $\bigcap\mathcal F$.

Not a duplicate of this or this. This is exercise $4.4.23$ from the book How to Prove it by Velleman $($$2^{nd}$ edition$)$: Prove theorem $4.4.11.$ Theorem $4.4.11.$ Suppose $A$ is a set, $\mathcal F\...
Khashayar Baghizadeh's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
121 views

Prove that if $x$ is the greatest lower bound of $U$, then $x$ is the least upper bound of $B$.

Not a duplicate of this or this. This is exercise $4.4.21.c$ from the book How to Prove it by Velleman $($$2^{nd}$ edition$)$: Suppose $R$ is a partial order on $A$ and $B\subseteq A$. Let $U$ be the ...
Khashayar Baghizadeh's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
76 views

Suppose $L=\{((a,b),(a',b'))\in(A\times B)\times(A\times B)|aRa' \land(a=a'\rightarrow bSb'\}$. Show that $L$ is a partial order on $A\times B$.

Not a duplicate of this, this, or this. This is exercise $4.4.9$ from the book How to Prove it by Velleman $($$2^{nd}$ edition$)$: Suppose $R$ is a partial order on $A$ and $S$ is a partial order on $...
Khashayar Baghizadeh's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5