Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
3 votes
1 answer
396 views

Does Löwenheim-Skolem require Foundation in any way?

As title states, I'm curious whether Löwenheim-Skolem (in either of its upward or downward versions) necessitates some implicit use of Foundation. The usual presentation makes quite clear the reliance ...
Sho's user avatar
  • 512
4 votes
1 answer
137 views

How can we verify if a structure statisfies ZFC or not?

I'm studying set theory which leads me to some confusions of model theory. For the context, I know that the set $\mathbb{N}$ with the usual operations $(0,+,×)$ is a model of Peano arithmetic. It ...
InTheSearchForKnowledge's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
64 views

Connection of axioms of first order logic and axioms of first order theory

If we have a set of sentences S in first order logic. We know that we can create a first order theory Th(S) from S, which is the "set S" union "the sentences which we can prove them ...
zaxsqwedc's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
1k views

How can different models of set theory be constructed from the same set of axioms?

A beginner question here, sorry if it seems obvious. From my understanding, a set theory like ZFC strictly dictates what can and cannot exist, e.g. the Axiom of Infinity implies the existence of an ...
ThePhilosopher's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
155 views

Can every set in the Von-Neumann universe be obtained from finite ZFC steps [closed]

For me, ZFC feels like saying either something is a set, or from a set, we know another thing is a set. On the other hand, something like doing the powerset operations for $\omega$ a number of times ...
wsz_fantasy's user avatar
  • 1,722
4 votes
2 answers
499 views

Functions that cannot be written as functional formulas and the axiom of replacement

A formula $\phi(x, y)$ defined a function on a set X if for each $x \in X$, there is exactly one set y such that $\phi(x,y)$ holds. We then say $\phi$ is a functional formula, in the sense that it ...
wsz_fantasy's user avatar
  • 1,722
3 votes
1 answer
170 views

Is there a tangible countable model of set theory

ZFC or NBG set theory have a countable model by Löwenheim-Skolem. But I never found an example of one with real tangible sets. Of course I do not look for a consistency proof. I am seeking to see how ...
Ascan Heydorn's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
41 views

Semantic Interpretation of the axiom of restricted separation

In a follow up to this answer to a previous question, I want to see if I have a correct understanding now of the semantic interpretation of the axiom of restricted separation. As a side note I'm also ...
Ari's user avatar
  • 855
0 votes
1 answer
88 views

Power sets vs definable power sets in the minimal standard model of ZFC

As noted in this answer by Eric Wofsey, as well as the Wikipedia page on the Constructible Universe, we have that $L_\alpha$ is strictly smaller than $V_\alpha$ for any $\alpha > \omega$ unless $\...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
73 views

Stronger versions of the Power Set Axiom?

In this article on Skolem's Paradox, it gives the Power Set Axiom as an example where models may badly misinterpret the axioms (compared to the "intention" of the axiom). While originally I ...
Davis Yoshida's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
180 views

Is the theory for $\mathbb{R}$ categorical or not?

The usual axioms of $\mathbb{R}$ consist of the ordered field axioms plus the least upperbound property. Because the least upperbound property is a statement that quantifies over sets of real numbers, ...
Maximal Ideal's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
504 views

Concrete and abstract models of axiomatic systems

In order to prove the consistency of an axiomatic system we must come up with a model. Wikipedia gives the following definition for a model of an axiomatic system: A model for an axiomatic system is ...
ado sar's user avatar
  • 256
11 votes
2 answers
655 views

What exactly is the distinction between a theory and model in model theory if models are themselves constructed in axiomatic theories?

My understanding is that model theory requires a distinction between a logical theory and a structure to interpret the statements of the theory. However, every piece of mathematics including every ...
Maximal Ideal's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
145 views

How do model theorists define structures?

Let $L$ be a first order language and $A$ be an L-structure. Let $\sigma$ be an L-sentence. In most of the mathematics I have seen a structure is defined by the axioms it satisfies. These may or may ...
user's user avatar
  • 105
1 vote
1 answer
44 views

Non-contradictory axiom system for a binary operation

Suppose we want to define a binary operation $\otimes:\mathbb{N} \times\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ on a ring $(\mathbb{N},+,\cdot)$ with an arbitrary system of axioms. The axioms may be given ...
Nikita Dezhic's user avatar

15 30 50 per page