Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
1 vote
2 answers
62 views

Show that $\{\alpha<\omega_1 : L_\alpha \prec L_{\omega_1}\}$ is closed unbounded in $\omega_1$.

I was doing this exercise and there is a hint to consider the Skolem functions for $L_{\omega_1}$. However, I did not find any general definition of what a Skolem function may be in Kunen (1980), and ...
Derewsnanu's user avatar
-1 votes
2 answers
107 views

When we say "cardinality of first order language L" and "cardinality of a structure or model" what we are meaning? [closed]

I ask about for what set we are referring for these cardinalities?
zaxsqwedc's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
57 views

Bound for the cardinality of the model of a set of formulas

I don't know if the proof of the theorem below is correct. The goal is to do the proof from the beginning, without using compactness or Löwenheim-Skolem. Only the Tarski-Vaught test (maybe). We are ...
Yester's user avatar
  • 414
0 votes
0 answers
41 views

Are cardinals always partial-well-ordered without AC? [duplicate]

With AC, we have that cardinals are well-ordered. Without AC, we can have two sets which are incomparable, meaning that, at best, cardinals are only partially ordered. But do we still have, without AC,...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
73 views

Help with an exercise on the cardinality of the set of formulae of a First-Order Language.

Let $\mathcal{L}$ be a first order language consisting of: $P_i$ predicate symbols, $f_j$ function symbols & $c_k$ constant symbols indexed respectively by th sets $I,J$ & $K$. Furthermore ...
user152874's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
95 views

Are there any proposed operations to actually construct an inaccessible set?

When we postulate the smallest infinite set, we define it using an interative process involving iterations on the empty set. When we postulate the existence of a set of continuum cardinality, we again ...
Ryder Rude's user avatar
  • 1,437
1 vote
0 answers
68 views

Let $T=\{c_m\neq c_n: m,n\in \mathbb{N}, m\neq n \}$ in the language $L=\{c_n : n\in \mathbb{N}\}$. Prove that T is not $\aleph_0$-categorical.

as the title says I am asked to prove the following: Let $T=\{c_m\neq c_n: m,n\in \mathbb{N}, m\neq n \}$ in the language $L=\{c_n : n\in \mathbb{N}\}$, where each $c_n$ is a constant symbol. Prove ...
cento18's user avatar
  • 391
1 vote
1 answer
60 views

elementary embeddings $j$ in set theory with $V$ and $M$

I'm confused by a variety of elementary non-trivial elementary embedings $j$ we might have. There are 9 "syntactical" possiblities;Here $M$ is a transitive model. I'll name them with a wish ...
user122424's user avatar
  • 3,978
0 votes
1 answer
286 views

What does it mean "cardinality of a model" and "cardinality of a language" ? Are they the same thing? (Model Theory)

I'm studying the lowenheim- skolem theorem but i am a bit confused this when it comes to cardinality, in some definitions they use the cardanality of the language, in others they use the cardinality ...
ClockTok's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
95 views

Reducing to regular cardinals in c.c.c. implies same cardinals and cofinalities

In Chapter 14 of Jech's Set Theory, he asserts the following: Definition 14.33. A forcing notion $P$ satisfies the countable chain condition (c.c.c.) if every antichain in $P$ is at most countable. ...
Connor Gordon's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
92 views

$\operatorname{cf}(\sup(B \cap \omega_m))$ is the natural numbers

Let $\mathcal{L}=\{\in, \preceq\}$. Let $\mathcal{A}=(V_\theta, \in)$ (where $\theta > \omega_\omega$) be an $\mathcal{L}$-structure which interprets $\preceq^\mathcal{A}$ by some fixed well-...
Pascal's Wager's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
501 views

Which ordinals can be "mistaken for" $\aleph_1$?

I've just finished working my way through Weaver's proof of the consistency of the negation of the Continuum Hypothesis in his book Forcing for Mathematicians. One of the key points in this proof is ...
Franklin Pezzuti Dyer's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
115 views

Cardinality of a language $L_\Sigma$ over a decidable signature $\Sigma$

In the middle of a proof of a theorem I was studying, in order to prove a cardinality argument, there was the following statement: Note that $|L_\Sigma|=|\Sigma|+ \aleph_0$ Where $L_\Sigma$ is a ...
davinci_07's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
131 views

Uncountable Boolean algebra in ZFC with a countable ultrahomogeneity property

In ZFC, is there an uncountable atomless Boolean algebra $B$ such that for all countable subalgebras $A_1,A_2\subset B,$ every isomorphism $f:A_1\to A_2$ extends to an automorphism of $B$? $A_1$ and $...
Harry West's user avatar
  • 1,500
5 votes
0 answers
87 views

Is there a structure on $\mathbb{R}$ with a given cardinality of isomorphisms

We have, for example $|\mathrm{Aut} (\mathbb{R})|= |\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}|$ $|\mathrm{Aut} (\mathbb{R,+,0})|= |\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}|$ $|\mathrm{Aut} (\mathbb{R,<})|= |\mathbb{R}|$ $|\mathrm{Aut} (\...
Oddly Asymmetric's user avatar

15 30 50 per page