Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
1 answer
308 views

Dependence of the equation $a+1=a$ for infinite cardinals $a$ on the axiom of choice

let $A$ be a set such that for all $n \in $ N $ A ≉ N_n$ where $N_n = \{ 0 ,1 ,2 ...... n-1\} $ and $a$ be the Cardinality of $A$ meaning ($|A| = a$) is it possible to prove that $a+1=a$ without ...
theorem 28's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
87 views

Is there a way to construct larger cardinals without choice axiom?

From Cantor's Theorem, we know that $|\mathcal{P}(X)| > |X|$. So, we can define inductively a set with cardinality $\aleph_n, \forall n \in \mathbb{N}$. Let $\lbrace A_i\rbrace_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ ...
Edwin's user avatar
  • 31
17 votes
2 answers
402 views

Combinatorial proof, without axiom of choice, that for any set $A$, there is no surjection from $A^2$ to $3^A$

The well known proof of Cantor's theorem (stating that $A<2^A$ for any set $A$) does not make any use of the axiom of choice. I have now spent some time wondering if the analogous result $A^2<3^...
Tim Seifert's user avatar
  • 2,243
0 votes
0 answers
71 views

Does the proof that "a proper ascending chain of subsets of the naturals is countable" necessitate axiom of choice?

Let $(A_x)_{x\in X}$ be a collection of disjoint subsets of $\mathbb{N}$. Using the Axiom of Choice, i.e. assuming there exists a function $f:\{A_x\}_{x\in X}\to \bigcup_{x\in X} A_x$, with $f(A_x)\in ...
Connorlindquist's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
153 views

There is no surjective function from a set in the Hartogs number of its power set

I'm trying to prove an equivalent state of the Axiom of Choice : Given two non-empty sets, there is a surjective function from one of them into the other one. If we prove that for any non-empty set $X$...
Emanuele Angilè's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
216 views

When can you subtract cardinals? Does $|A|+|C|=|B|+|C|>|C|$ imply $|A|=|B|$ in ZF?

Suppose that $|A|+|C|=|B|+|C|$, and that both sides are strictly larger than $|C|$. Does this imply $|A|=|B|$ in the absence of the axiom of choice? With choice, cardinals are totally ordered, and $\...
Akiva Weinberger's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
32 views

Reordering a Sequence of Sets Whose Union is the Whole Set

I have a set $ B $ that can be written as $ B = \cup_{\nu < \lambda} B_{\nu} $ where $ \kappa $ is the cardinality of $ B $, that is uncountable, and $ \vert B_{\nu} \vert < \kappa $ with $ \...
nomeaning's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
156 views

Does Cantor's paradox require the axiom of choice?

Wikipedia's article about Cantor's paradox claims that it requires that the cardinals are linearly ordered. But can't we show that the cardinality of the universal set is the greatest cardinality ...
Arvid Samuelsson's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
41 views

Are cardinals always partial-well-ordered without AC? [duplicate]

With AC, we have that cardinals are well-ordered. Without AC, we can have two sets which are incomparable, meaning that, at best, cardinals are only partially ordered. But do we still have, without AC,...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
116 views

Showing cardinality inequalities involving equivalence relations without the Axiom of Choice

I am studying a course on ZF Set Theory and am currently looking at the cardinalities of infinite sets. Consider any equivalence relation $\equiv$ on any set $X$. Show that $$2 ^{ |X/{\equiv}|} \leq ...
FD_bfa's user avatar
  • 4,331
13 votes
0 answers
256 views

Conditions needed to prove $|A|^{|P(A)|}=|P(P(A))|$

I'm trying to figure out if ${|A|}^{|P(A)|}=|P(P(A))|$ (where $A$ is infinite) is provable without the Axiom of Choice. I know unconditionally we have the lower bound: $|A|^{|P(A)|}\geq 2^{|P(A)|}=|P(...
Ari's user avatar
  • 855
2 votes
2 answers
311 views

For infinite cardinal $\kappa$, $\kappa$ . $\kappa$ = $\kappa$ . Set Theory Enderton p-162, Lemma 6R

Enderton's proof goes like below; Let B be any infinite set of cardinality $\kappa$. Let $H=${$f|f=$$\emptyset$ or $f: A×A-A$ is a bijection for some A $\subseteq B$} Then he showed that any chain in ...
user avatar
19 votes
1 answer
645 views

Can free groups on different cardinals be isomorphic in ZF?

For the free group on a finite number of generators, $F_n$, this is simple. It is enough to find a group that can be a quotient of one and not the other, so it is sufficient to find a group that can ...
Zoe Allen's user avatar
  • 5,633
21 votes
1 answer
529 views

When does $|X^n|\leq |k^X|$ without the axiom of Choice?

We're working in $\sf{ZF}$ set theory, we assume $n$ is a finite cardinal, and the set $X$ is not finite. My question is: what's the smallest cardinal $k$ for which $\sf{ZF}$ proves $|X^n| \leq |k^X|$?...
Jade Vanadium's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
105 views

What's the groupification of the cardinal numbers (without using AC)?

The set-theoretic cardinal numbers form an abelian monoid under addition (ignoring size problems). Under the axiom of choice, given two cardinal numbers $c$ and $d$, there exists a cardinal number $e$ ...
wlad's user avatar
  • 8,215

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
13