Linked Questions

1 vote
0 answers
67 views

What's the proof that the only Dedekind-complete field is the reals? [duplicate]

I know that the field of the rational numbers is ordered but not Dedekind-complete. What's the proof that the only Dedekind-complete field is the reals?
mathlander's user avatar
  • 4,057
49 votes
7 answers
8k views

Is the real number structure unique?

For a frame of reference, I'm an undergraduate in mathematics who has taken the introductory analysis series and the graduate level algebra sequence at my university. In my analysis class, our book ...
Tyler's user avatar
  • 2,233
2 votes
4 answers
122 views

Are different constructions of an algebraic structure always isomorphic?

Any two complete ordered fields are isomorphic (as proved, e.g., in Spivak's Calculus; see also this question). While I understand this proof, I cannot yet appreciate why it is necessary. Given any ...
MGA's user avatar
  • 9,666
2 votes
2 answers
214 views

What does isomorphism mean in "$\mathbb{R}$ is the Dedekind-complete ordered field up to isomorphism"?

This is an embarrassing question, because I learned about this theorem in basic analysis, but haven't realized that I don't really understand its statement until now. Anyway, it's a famous result ...
Chill2Macht's user avatar
  • 21.3k
4 votes
1 answer
177 views

Do there exist another $\mathbb{R}$?

Can we find a set other the $\mathbb{R}$ satisfying all the field axioms, order properties and completeness axiom? By another set I mean, it differs from $\mathbb{R}$ may be in terms of topology, ...
Saravanan's user avatar
  • 462
1 vote
1 answer
242 views

Real numbers axiomatization without natural numbers

I think to remember that there is way to uniquely characterize the real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ via an axiom set. I wonder if this is possibly without introducing some notion of the natural numbers $\...
Nikolaj-K's user avatar
  • 12.3k
2 votes
1 answer
127 views

Uniqueness of the real line

A few days ago, I came across this question in a review queue. I tried my luck at it. Here is what I did: If I want a homomorphism (isomorphism, but even just homomorphism) $f:\mathbb{R}\to F$, then ...
MickG's user avatar
  • 8,795
1 vote
1 answer
91 views

How can it be true both that Complete Ordered Fields are unique up to isomorphism and that anything that can prove Peano Arithmetic is incomplete?

The real numbers include the natural numbers which presumably satisfy the Peano axioms, I don't know how you could be a strong enough theory to prove the existence of a set that satisfies the Peano ...
William Bell's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
148 views

Can the so-called completeness of real numbers be understood as closure under limits in the real number system?

Source of background information:《The Real Analysis Lifesaver》ISBN:9780691172934 P37: “the axiom of completeness”—here, completeness is just another word for the least upper bound/greatest lower ...
bokabokaboka's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
81 views

Characterizations of the reals

I know that one characterization of the reals is that it is the only Dedekind-complete ordered field. Are there any other characterizations of the reals as a field?
mathlander's user avatar
  • 4,057