I just describe you what should have been done and do not dwell into computing the radius of convergence.
For a power series $\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}a_nz^n$, formally, the radius of convergence $R$ is defined to be
$$R = \frac{1}{\lim\sup\limits_{n\to\infty}|a_n|^{\frac{1}{n}}}.\tag{1}$$
Where, conventionally we take $R=0$ if the limit supremum is infinity and we take $R=0$, if the limit supremum is $0$.
We do not rely on ratio test for finding the radius of convergence. Observe that, the radius of convergence $R$ is such a number that the power series $\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}a_nz^n$ converges if $|z|<R$ and diverges if $|z|>R$. The definition in $(1)$ satisfies this and this was arrived at through root test. There was an advantage in root test which says if $\sum\limits_{n}a_n$ is a series, and $\alpha=\lim\sup\limits_{n\to \infty} |a_n|^{\frac{1}{n}}$, then
- The series converges if $\alpha<1$
- The series diverges if $\alpha>1$.
Note that for both convergence and divergence, we keep the same quantity, i.e. limit supremum.
While in ratio test, which says if $\lim\sup\limits_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=\alpha$, then the series converges if $\alpha<1$. But it does not tell that the series diverges if $\alpha>1$. For instance, consider the series
$$\frac{1}{2}+1+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{32}+\frac{1}{16}+\dots$$
Clearly, $\lim\sup\limits_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}$ of the above series is $2>1$ but the series converges. Hence, ratio test cannot endow the property which we are looking for in $R$, the radius of convergence.
Also if the radius of convergence is $R$, then you cannot conclude from it that
$$\lim\sup\limits_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=\frac{1}{R}$$
Because, for the series
$$\frac{1}{2}+x+\frac{1}{8}x^2+\frac{1}{4}x^3+\dots,$$
the radius of convergence is $2$, while also $\lim\sup\limits_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=2$.
Only under certain circumstances such as: if $a_n$ is positive and if $\lim\limits_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}$ exists, then we have in this situation the quantity in $(1)$ equals this limit.