1
$\begingroup$

I was reading a bit of convex analysis and came across this problem.

Let $S$ be convex. Let $A$ be the set of finite affine combinations of points in $S$ (i.e. finite linear combinations whose weights sum to $1$). Prove that the difference $A+(-A)$, where $+$ denotes the Minkowski sum, is the span of $S+(-S)$.

It seems like one direction of the set containment is straightforward (going from the span to the difference).

In the other direction starting with the difference, I ran into a roadblock. We can express elements as differences of finite affine combinations, but I did not manage to decompose it as a linear combination of differences of elements in $S$. I also tried Caratheodory's theorem (since $A$ is convex) to try to force the decomposition, but the question of which differences of elements in $S$ to choose still remains (I am still not sure why $S$ being convex is relevant).

I am looking for an efficient method to prove this other direction, as it seems like several other argument paths require too much case analysis.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $r_1 x_1 + \ldots + r_m x_m$ and $s_1 y_1 + \ldots + s_n y_n$ be elements of $A$, i.e., two affine combinations where all the $x_i$ and $y_j$ belong to $S$. Then $r_m = 1 - (r_1 + \ldots + r_{m-1})$ and so we may write

$$r_1 x_1 + \ldots + r_m x_m = r_1(x_1 - x_m) + \ldots + r_{m-1}(x_{m-1}-x_m) + x_m$$ with a similar observation for $s_1 y_1 + \ldots + s_n y_n$. Then

$$(r_1 x_1 + \ldots + r_m x_m) - (s_1 y_1 + \ldots + s_n y_n) =$$ $$r_1(x_1 - x_m) + \ldots + r_{n-1}(x_{m-1} - x_m) - s_1(y_1 - y_m) + \ldots - s_n(y_{n-1} - y_n) + 1 \cdot (x_m - y_n)$$ is manifestly a linear combination of elements of $S + (-S)$, and so $A + (-A) \subseteq \mathrm{span}(S + (-S))$, which seems to be the direction you want.

By the way, the other inclusion is wrong for $S$ the empty set! Because the span always contains the zero element and yet $A$ and $-A$ and $A + (-A)$ for this case are all empty!

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It looks like this works! Is the assumption that $S$ is convex used to obtain either inclusion? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 16 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ No, it's never used. But for the other inclusion, I did require that $S$ is nonempty. Select an element $x \in S$. Any element $r_1(x_1 - y_1) + \ldots + r_n(x_n - y_n)$ in span($S + (-S)$) may be written as a difference of affine combinations $(r_1 x_1 + \ldots + r_n x_n + r x) - (r_1 y_1 + \ldots + r_n y_n + rx)$ where we take $r = 1 - r_1 - \ldots - r_n$ to ensure affineness. $\endgroup$
    – user43208
    Commented Feb 16 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ (If you find this answer helpful, please upvote it and consider accepting it as the answer.) $\endgroup$
    – user43208
    Commented Feb 16 at 21:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .