3
$\begingroup$

I want to proof the following: $$ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^n= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 2^n-1 & 2^n \\ \end{array} } \right] $$

I betitle the matrix on the left with $A$ and the matrix on the right with $B$.

I am not finding the right idea. I started with stating that the resulting matrix of $ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^n $ has to be a $2\times2$ matrix because of the definition of matrix multiplication. Then I wrote the following $$ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^n= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]\times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]\times\dots\times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1\times 1+0\times 1 & 1\times 0 + 0\times 2 \\ 1\times 1 + 2\times 1 & 1\times 0 + 2\times 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]\times\dots\times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 3 & 4 \\ \end{array} } \right]\times\dots\times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]$$

My idea behind this was that this should show that the first line will never change, because we always just multiply with the same matrix again. I think this is quite easy to see.

For the second line it's in my opinion quite easy to see that the second number ($b_{22}$) is always the old second number ($a_{22}$) times 2 and because the first number with wich we started ($a_{22}$) is the number 2 it's just always powers of 2. And the first number ($b_{21}$) is always the old first number ($a_{21}$) plus the old second number ($a_{22}$). And because the first number with wich we started ($a_{21}$) is on less than the second number with wich we started ($a_{22}$) it's always one less than the power of 2.

I have problems with explaining my proof and I am not quite sure if it's correct, so can maybe someone recommend a more exact way of proofing this, because I don't know if my sentences are exact enough.

Induction Try

Thanks to the comment from @Jaap Sherphuis I now tried to proof the statement with induction and started with the basecase $n=1$.

$$ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^1=\left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 2^1-1 & 2^1 \\ \end{array} } \right]$$

This is obviously true. Now I take $ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^n= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 2^n-1 & 2^n \\ \end{array} } \right] $ as given and try to show with it the statement for $n=n+1$. $$ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^{n+1}= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 2^{n+1}-1 & 2^{n+1} \\ \end{array} } \right]\Leftrightarrow \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^n \times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 2^n-1 & 2^n \\ \end{array} } \right] \times \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right] $$

Because $ \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{array} } \right]^n= \left[ {\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 2^n-1 & 2^n \\ \end{array} } \right] $ is true the whole statement is true for $n=n+1$ and thus the whole statement is true for every $n\in\mathbb{N}$.

Is this the correct approach?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Use induction, showing that $B_nA_1=B_{n+1}$ as the induction step, with the trivial base case $A_1=B_1$, $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 14:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could also prove it directly by diagonalizing the matrix. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ @JaapScherphuis I know added a try with induction, can you maybe look over it for me. I would be very grateful. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 15:03
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Your induction is basically right, but two tips: (i) Describe inductive steps as going from $n=k$ to $n=k+1$, so you don't have to write $n=n+1$. (ii) We usually start from the case $n=k$ (inductive hypothesis), then deduce the case $n=k+1$. Your use of $\iff$ to restate what the inductive step has to prove is strictly speaking correct, but readers can find it confusing. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 15:14

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The matrix can be represented as $$I+P,\quad P=\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\ 1&1\end{pmatrix}$$ We have $P^2=P.$ Thus $$(I+P)^n=I+\sum_{k=1}^n{n\choose k}P^k=I+(2^n-1)P$$

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .