A derivative of the incomplete beta function $\text B_x(a,b)$ uses hypergeometric $_3\text F_2$
$$\frac{d\text B_x(a,b)}{da}=\ln(x)\text B_x(a,b)-\frac{x^a}{a^2}\,_3\text F_2(a,a,1-b;a+1,a+1;x)$$
Now reduce to a Gauss hypergeometric function $_2\text F_1(a,b;c;x)$:
$$\begin{align}_3\text F_2(a,a,1-b;a+1,a+1;x)=\,_2\text F_1(1-b,a;a+1;x)-a\,_2\text F_1^{(0,1,0,0)}(1-b,a,a+1;x)-a\,_2\text F_1^{(0,0,1,0)}(1-b,a,a+1;x)=\lim_{c\to a}\frac{c\,_2\text F_1(1-b,a;a+1;x)-a\,_2\text F_1(1-b,c;c+1;x)}{c-a}=\underbrace{{\lim_{c\to a}\frac{ac}{c-a}\left(\frac{\text B_x(a,b)}{x^a}-\frac{\text B_x(c,b)}{x^c}\right)= \lim_{c\to b}\frac{bc}{b-c}\left(\frac{\text B_x(a,c)}{x^c}-\frac{\text B_x(a,b)}{x^b}\right)}}_{(1)} \end{align}$$
Shown here is the beta result and $\frac {df(u,v)}{du}=f^{(1,0)}(u,v)$. However, one is unsure of the next step.
Alternatively, we prove a simpler form of $(1)$ using these beta integrals
$$\,_3\text F_2(a,a,1-b;a+1,a+1;x)=\underbrace{\frac{a^2}{x^a}\int\frac{\text B_x(a,b)}x dx}_{(2)}=\underbrace{\frac{a^2}{x^a}\lim_{c\to 0}\frac{x^c\text B_x(a,b)-\text B_x(a+c,b)}c}_{(3)}$$
All three attempts, $(1),(2),(3)$ use simpler functions, but are not closed forms.
Is there a closed form of $_3\text F_2(a,a,1-b;a+1,a+1;x)$ in terms of simpler functions?