1
$\begingroup$

A mapping $T$ of a metric space $X$ into a metric space $Y$ is continuous iff the inverse image of any open subset $Y$ is open subset of $X$.

Proof: (a)Suppose that $T$ is continuous. Let $S \subset Y$ be open and $S_0$ the inverse image of $S$. If $S_0 = \emptyset$, it is open. Let $S_0 \neq \emptyset$. For any $x_0\in S_0$ let $y_0=Tx_0$. Since $S$ is open, it contains an $\epsilon$-neighborhood $N$ of $y_0$. Since $T$ is continuous, $x_0$ has a $\delta$-neighborhood $N_0$ which is mapped into $N$. Since $N\subset S$, we have $N_0\subset S_0$ ...

Please You will be able explain me in detailed this part "Since $N\subset S$, we have $N_0\subset S_0$", I don't understand "we have $N_0\subset S_0$".

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I've changed the word "null" to the symbol of empty set because it was what it seemed you intended to write. So please, verify if I didn't change the meaning of your question. Good luck! $\endgroup$
    – Gold
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ What is your definition of continuous? $\endgroup$
    – Pedro
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 13:16

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

If $x \in N_0$, then $T(x) \in N$ (as "$N_0$ is mapped into $N$") so $T(x)$ is in $S$ (as we assume that $N \subset S$). So by definition, $x \in S_0$, as $S_0$ is defined the be the inverse image of $S$ ($S_0 = T^{-1}[S]$), so exactly the set of all $p$ with $T(p) \in S$, and the $x$ we start with is such a point.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ When you say: "$T(x) \in S_0" is "T^{-1}(x) \in S_0$"? $\endgroup$
    – juaninf
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 14:19
  • $\begingroup$ @juaninf no, I mean $x \in S_0$ (corrected it) $\endgroup$ Commented May 19, 2013 at 8:18
0
$\begingroup$

Inverse images preserve set inclusion. More explicitly:

$x\in N_0 \Rightarrow Tx \in N \Rightarrow Tx \in S \Rightarrow x \in S_0.$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ but Why $Tx \in S \Rightarrow x \in S_0$? $\endgroup$
    – juaninf
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 11:22
  • $\begingroup$ Which is the guarantee that such for all $\epsilon$ the $\delta$-neighborhood belong $S_0$? $\endgroup$
    – juaninf
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ Why the inverse image preserver set inclusion? $\endgroup$
    – juaninf
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 11:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .