Lemma: If $u_k\gt0$ and
$$
\sum_{k=1}^n\frac1{1+u_k}=1\tag1
$$
then
$$
\prod_{k=1}^nu_k\ge(n-1)^n\tag2
$$
To answer the question: apply the Lemma with $u_k=x_k/m$.
$\boldsymbol{u_k\lt1}$ Does Not Minimize $\boldsymbol{(2)}$:
Condition $(1)$ allows only one of the $u_k$ to be less than $1$. Suppose that $u_1\lt1$. Then
$$
\begin{align}
0
&\ge\frac1{1+u_1}+\frac1{1+u_2}-1\tag3\\
&=\frac{1-u_1u_2}{(1+u_1)(1+u_2)}\tag4\\
&\ge\frac{1-u_1u_2}{2+2u_1u_2}\tag5\\
&=\frac12+\frac1{1+u_1u_2}-1\tag6
\end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$(3)$: apply $(1)$
$(4)$: algebra
$\phantom{(4)\text{:}}$ this implies $u_1u_2\ge1$
$(5)$: $(1+u_1)(1+u_2)-(2+2u_1u_2)=(1-u_1)(u_2-1)\ge0$
$\phantom{(5)\text{:}}$ and $1-u_1u_2\le0$
$(6)$: algebra
If $u_1\lt1$, let $u$ be so that $\frac12+\frac1{1+u}=\frac1{1+u_1}+\frac1{1+u_2}\le1$. Then $u\ge1$ and $(6)$ says that
$$
\begin{align}
\frac12+\frac1{1+u}
&=\frac1{1+u_1}+\frac1{1+u_2}\tag7\\
&\ge\frac12+\frac1{1+u_1u_2}\tag8
\end{align}
$$
Thus, we can replace $u_1$ and $u_2$ by $1$ and $u$, which maintains $(1)$ and reduces $(2)$ (because $(8)$ says that $u\le u_1u_2$). So to minimize $(2)$, we can assume $u_k\ge1$ for all $k$.
Here are three proofs of the Lemma, one using convexity, one using variational methods, and one using AM-GM.
Convexity Proof:
Note that $(1+x)\log(x)$ is convex for $x\ge1$. Therefore, since we can assume $u_k\ge1$,
$$
\begin{align}
\sum_{k=1}^n\log(u_k)
&=\sum_{k=1}^n(1+u_k)\log(u_k)\frac1{1+u_k}\tag9\\
&\ge\left(1+\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{u_k}{1+u_k}\right)\log\left(\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{u_k}{1+u_k}\right)\tag{10}\\[6pt]
&=n\log(n-1)\tag{11}
\end{align}
$$
Explanation:
$\phantom{1}(9)$: multiply and divide each term by $1+u_k$
$(10)$: apply Jensen's Inequality to $(1+x)\log(x)$
$(11)$: use $(1)$ and $\frac{u_k}{1+u_k}=1-\frac1{1+u_k}$
$\large\square$
Variational Proof: Restricted by $(1)$, the variations of $u_k$ must satisfy
$$
\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\delta u_k}{(1+u_k)^2}=0\tag{12}
$$
To minimize the product in $(2)$, the variations of $u_k$ must satisfy
$$
\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\delta u_k}{u_k}=0\tag{13}
$$
So that every variation that satisfies $(1)$ also satisfies $(2)$, variational orthogonality requires that there be a constant $\lambda$ so that
$$
(1+u_k)^2=\lambda u_k\tag{14}
$$
For any $\lambda\gt4$, there are two roots of $(14)$. Since the product of these roots is $1$, either both roots are $1$ or one root must be less than $1$ and the other must be greater. As mentioned earlier, we are only concerned with $u_k\ge1$. That forces all the $u_k$ to be the same. Therefore, $(1)$ says that
$$
u_k=n-1\tag{15}
$$
which gives $(2)$.
$\large\square$
The following is merely a fleshing out of Conrad's answer.
AM-GM Proof:
Let $v_k=\frac1{1+u_k}$, then $u_k=\frac{1-v_k}{v_k}$. $(1)$ becomes
$$
\sum_{k=1}^nv_k=1\tag{16}
$$
Furthermore, the AM-GM shows that
$$
\begin{align}
\frac{1-v_m}{n-1}
&=\frac1{n-1}\sum_{k\ne m}v_k\\
&\ge\left(\prod_{k\ne m}v_k\right)^{\frac1{n-1}}\\
&=\left(\frac1{v_m}\prod_{k=1}^nv_k\right)^{\frac1{n-1}}\tag{17}
\end{align}
$$
Taking the product of $(18)$ over $m$ from $1$ to $n$ yields
$$
\frac1{(n-1)^n}\prod_{m=1}^n(1-v_m)\ge\left(\prod_{m=1}^nv_m\right)^{-\frac1{n-1}}\left(\prod_{k=1}^nv_k\right)^{\frac{n}{n-1}}\tag{18}
$$
Cancelling and commuting terms in $(18)$ gives
$$
\begin{align}
\prod_{k=1}^nu_k
&=\prod_{m=1}^n\frac{1-v_m}{v_m}\\[6pt]
&\ge(n-1)^n\tag{19}
\end{align}
$$
$\large\square$