0
$\begingroup$

$E = \{{x+y : x,y \in\Bbb R_{>0}}$}

I was able to figure out that this set does not have a supremum, but I am not able to prove it. Also, how can I prove the infimum of this set ?

This is my logic: This set does not have a supremum, because x,y can not be negative real numbers, and the the definition of the set is x+y, which will produce a bigger real number, and this set will grow without bound. When it comes to infimum, I think that it should be zero. For this set, the infimum of A is not an element of the set, because x,y are strictly greater than zero.

Can someone provide a sufficent proof for the supremum and infimum of this set ?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You pretty much proved it already. Just sit down and formalize what you've already observed. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2016 at 3:57
  • $\begingroup$ Note that $\mathbb{N} \subset E$. $\endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Commented Nov 26, 2016 at 4:58

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Assume that the $\sup E$ exists, thus there is some number $b \in R_{>0}$ s.t $\forall(x+y), x,y \in R_{>0}$ then $b \geq (x+y)$, but then $b+1$ is a sum of two numbers in $R_{>0}$ and $b+1>b$, contradiction.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ How can I prove that the infimum is zero ? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2016 at 18:32
1
$\begingroup$

$\bullet$ The supremum of $E$ does not exist because $E$ is not bounded above (for every $R>0$ the element $R+R$ belongs to $E$ and is striclty greater than $R$).

$\bullet$ The infimum of $E$ is $0$ because (as every element of $E$ is positive) is it a lower bound, and for every $\varepsilon>0$ the element $\varepsilon/3+\varepsilon/3$ belongs to $E$ and is strictly smaller than $\varepsilon$ (so there can't be a greater lower bound of $E$).

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .