58
$\begingroup$

In which cases is the inverse of a matrix equal to its transpose, that is, when do we have $A^{-1} = A^{T}$? Is it when $A$ is orthogonal?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I will post a new question as this is not what I've asked at the title. Sorry for the invonvenience :S What I asked at the title was answered :) $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Commented Jun 10, 2012 at 23:38
  • $\begingroup$ Look OK now. ${}{}$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 11, 2012 at 3:02

2 Answers 2

77
$\begingroup$

If $A^{-1}=A^T$, then $A^TA=I$. This means that each column has unit length and is perpendicular to every other column. That means it is an orthonormal matrix.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ at the risk of reviving a dodgy question, may I ask "why" the geometric interpretation of orthogonal matrix is equivalent to the algebraic definition you gave? I know the property, but I don't understand it. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 8:22
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @TrevorAlexander: Think of $A$ as an arrangement of $n$ columns (each $n$ elements tall). Then the $(i,j)$ element of $A^TA$ is the dot product of the $i^\text{th}$ and $j^\text{th}$ columns of $A$ since the $i^\text{th}$ row of $A^T$ is the $i^\text{th}$ column of $A$. $\endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 10:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ could you give me confidence that this is actually an "if and only if"? I mean that both directions hold: $A^{-1} = A^\top \Leftrightarrow A^\top A = I$ $\endgroup$
    – Milla Well
    Commented Mar 25, 2014 at 17:20
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @MillaWell: $A^{-1}=A^T\implies A^TA=I$: Multiply both sides on the right by $A$. $A^TA=I\implies A^{-1}=A^T$: By definition. $\endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Commented Mar 25, 2014 at 18:40
9
$\begingroup$

You're right. This is the definition of orthogonal matrix.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .