0
$\begingroup$

I am confused with the inductive step of this very basic induction example in the book Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications:

$$1 + 2+· · ·+k = k(k + 1) / 2$$

When we apply $k+1$, the equation becomes:

$$1 + 2+· · ·+k+(k+1) = k+1(k + 1)+ 1 / 2 = (k+1)(k+2)/2$$

Now I am completely lost in the actual inductive step of the equation,

$$1 + 2+· · ·+k + (k + 1) = k(k + 1) 2 + (k + 1) = k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1) / 2 = (k + 1)(k + 2) / 2$$

As I understand it, we get

$$(k+1)(k+2)/2$$

when we substitute $k+1$ from $k$ in $k(k+1)/2$ and simplifying. How is $k(k + 1) / 2 + (k + 1)$ derived?

Can someone explain what this really means? I just simplified$ k+1(k + 1)+ 1 / 2 $to $(k+1)(k+2)/2 $it's in the book, but it suddenly becomes $k(k + 1) / 2 + (k + 1)$ and we just did the addition to turn it back to $(k+1)(k+2)/2$. How did it happen?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Using $/$ to express rational functions makes it very hard to read. Instead, I recommend using $\frac{k(k+1)}{2}$ for $\frac{k(k+1)}{2}$ or $\dfrac{k(k+1)}{2}$ for $\dfrac{k(k+1)}{2}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 11:47
  • $\begingroup$ What is it that you don't get? That $k(k+1)/2+(k+1) = (k+1)(k+2)/2$? $\endgroup$
    – skyking
    Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ @skyking do you mind writing the equations in your comments in text format? I can't read it right now. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:25
  • $\begingroup$ That's odd (I can read), however the equation was k(k+1)/2+(k+1)=(k+1)(k+2)/2. $\endgroup$
    – skyking
    Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:31
  • $\begingroup$ @skyking yes I understand that, you added k()/2 to k+1. But when you do p(k+1) you substitute k+1 to k, so k(k+1)/2 becomes k+1(k+1)+1/2 and to simplify (k+1)(k+2)/2. There I got (k+1)(k+2)/2. I don't understand how 1(k+1)/2+(k+1) got into the picture. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:43

4 Answers 4

1
$\begingroup$

The kicker, here, is to assume $$1+\cdots+k=\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\tag{$\star$}$$ for some $k,$ then use it to prove that $$1+\cdots+k+(k+1)=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}.\tag{$\heartsuit$}$$ To do so, we use $(\star)$ to substitute $\frac{k(k+1)}2$ for $1+\cdots+k,$ which turns $1+\cdots+k+(k+1)$ into $$\frac{k(k+1)}2+(k+1).$$ Then, combining over a common denominator and simplifying completes the proof of $(\heartsuit),$ thus concluding the inductive portion.

As a side note, at no point are you taking a "sum of all positive integers." Rather, you are proving that an identity involving the sum of the first $n$ positive integers is correct for any given positive integer $n$.


Added: Since the OP's screen reader is unable to handle rendered MathJax, I include here a plain text version.

The kicker, here, is to assume

1+...+k=k(k+1)/2

for some k, then use it to prove that

1+...+k+(k+1)=(k+1)(k+2)/2.

To do so, we use our assumption to substitute k(k+1)/2 for 1+...+k, which turns 1+...+k+(k+1) into

k(k+1)/2+(k+1).

Then, combining over a common denominator and simplifying completes the inductive portion of the proof.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, I am using a screen reader, and my screen reader can't read all your equations (E.G. "The kicker, here, is to assume for some then use it to prove that "). Do you mind putting a clear text format of the equations? Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 12:23
  • $\begingroup$ I am confused. Can you read your own post? If so, I wonder why your screen reader can't read mine. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ @CameronBuie The OP originally wrote without using MathJax, in plain text. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ @Cameron Buie I originally wrote it in plain text, someone edited it. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ @morbidCode: I see. What brand/model of screen reader do you use? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 13:25
1
$\begingroup$

I start with the answer in plain text as the OP seem to use screen reader that can't read TeX, the TeX formatted answer follows.

As you seem to have understood you want to prove (in the induction step that)

1+2+...+k+(k+1) = (k+1)(k+2)/2

but already in the assumption in the induction step you have:

1+2+...+k = k(k+1)/2

This means that the first sum can be rewritten:

1+2+...+k+(k+1) = (1+2+...+k) + (k+1)

The first parenthesis is equals k(k+1)/2 as assumed and therefore the sum becomes k(k+1)/2 + (k+1).

Then you have to show that k(k+1)/2+(k+1) = (k+1)(k+2)/2 which would complete the induction step.


As you seem to have understood you want to prove (in the induction step that)

$$1+2+...+k+(k+1) = {(k+1)(k+2)\over 2}$$

but already in the assumption in the induction step you have:

$$1+2+...+k = {k(k+1)\over 2}$$

This means that the first sum can be rewritten:

$$1+2+...+k+(k+1) = (1+2+...+k) + (k+1)$$

The first parenthesis is equals $k(k+1)/2$ as assumed and therefor the sum becomes $k(k+1)/2 + (k+1)$.

Then you have to show that $k(k+1)/2+(k+1) = (k+1)(k+2)/2$ which would complete the induction step.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Assume

$$1+...+k=\frac{k(k+1)}{2}$$

to calculate

$$1+...+k+(k+1)=\frac{k(k+1)}{2}+k+1=\frac{k^2+k+2k+2}{2}=\frac{k^2+3k+2}{2}=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}$$

completing the proof.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If that can help you:

$$1+2+3+4+5=\frac{5\cdot6}2,$$ 1+2+3+4+5=5.6/2

and $$1+2+3+4+5\color{green}{+6}=\frac{5\cdot6}2\color{green}{+6}=\frac{(5+2)\cdot6}2=\frac{6\cdot7}2.$$ 1+2+3+4+5+6=5.6/2+6=(5+2).6/2=6.7/2

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The OP is blind, and their screen reader apparently can't handle rendered MathJax, just so you know. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I'am adding straight text. $\endgroup$
    – user65203
    Commented Nov 18, 2015 at 13:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .