Suppose that $X$ has the Binomial distribution with parameters $n,p$ . How can I show that if $(n+1)p$ is integer then $X$ has two mode that is $(n+1)p$ or $(n+1)p-1?$
1 Answer
Let $a_k=P(X=k)$, we have $$a_k=\binom{n}{k}p^kq^{n-k}\qquad\text{and}\qquad a_{k+1}=\binom{n}{k+1}p^{k+1}q^{n-k- 1},$$ where as usual $q=1-p$ in binomial distribution.
We calculate the ratio $\dfrac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}$. Note that $\frac{\binom{n}{k+1}}{\binom{n}{k}}$ simplifies to $\frac{n-k}{k+1},$ and therefore $$\frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}=\frac{n-k}{k+1}\cdot\frac{p}{q}=\frac{n-k}{k+1}\cdot\frac{p}{1-p}.$$
From this equation we can follow:
$$\begin{align} k > (n+1)p-1 \implies a_{k+1} < a_k \\ k = (n+1)p-1 \implies a_{k+1} = a_k \\ k < (n+1)p-1 \implies a_{k+1} > a_k \end{align}$$
The calculation (almost) says that we have equality of two consecutive probabilities precisely if $a_{k+1}=a_k$, that is, if $k=np+p-1$. Note that $k=np+p-1$ implies that $np+p-1$ is an integer.
So if $k=np+p-1$ is not an integer, there is a single mode; and if $k=np+p-1$ is an integer, there are two modes, at $np+p-1$ and at $np+p$.
Not quite! We have been a little casual in our algebra. We have not paid attention to whether we might be multiplying or dividing by $0$. We also have casually accepted what the algebra seems to say, without doing a reality check.
Suppose that $p=0$. Then $np+p-1$ is an integer, namely $-1$. But whatever $n$ is, there is a single mode, namely $k=0$. In all other situations where $np+p-1$ is an integer, the $k$ we have identified is non-negative.
However, suppose that $p=1$. Again, $np+p-1$ is an integer, and again there is no double mode. The largest $a_k$ occurs at one place only, namely $k=n$, since $np+p$ is in this case beyond our range.
That completes the analysis when $np+p-1$ is an integer. When it is not, the analysis is simple. There is a single mode, at $\lfloor np+p\rfloor$.
To summarize in a single formula: $$\mathrm{mode(s)} = \begin{cases} 0, & \text{if } p = 0; \\ n, & \text{if } p = 1; \\ np + p - 1 \text{ and } np + p, & \text{if } np + p - 1 \in \mathbb{Z} \text{ and } 0 < p < 1; \\ \lfloor np + p \rfloor, & np + p - 1 \notin \mathbb{Z}. \end{cases}$$
-
2$\begingroup$ I am solving a similar exercise and I have some doubts: why taking the ratio $\frac{p_X(k+1)}{p_X(k)}$ gives you the mode (most probable value), which is defined as $\sup_{x \in R_X} p_X(x)$? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 7, 2014 at 23:26
-
4$\begingroup$ The sup is in this case a max, since the random variable takes on integer values. Apart from a couple of "degenerate" cases pointed out in the answer, the probabilities rise and then fall. The ratio of consecutive terms is therefore $\gt 1$ for a while, then $\lt 1$, except that in somewhat unusual cases we can have ratio $1$, so two consecutive values each qualify as a mode. Looking at the ratios tells us when the probability has reached a maximum. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 8, 2014 at 1:38
-
1$\begingroup$ Thanks very much for the explanation. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 8, 2014 at 2:47
-
1$\begingroup$ You are welcome. That was an overview. The detail is in the answer above. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 8, 2014 at 2:48