13
$\begingroup$

What is a random measure?

The Wikipedia article is quite confusing and used to formulate only a random counting measure instead of just the random measure. I'm working on the Dirichlet process and with the more in-depth articles they start with the notion of a random measure, but there is not much intuition given. Are there perhaps multiple definitions?

From what I understand it is a mapping from a probability space $(\Omega,\mathbb{F},\mathbb{P})$ to a measurable space $(S,\Sigma)$ just as a $(S,\Sigma)$-valued random variable.

The difference is that it is a specific $(S,\Sigma)$-valued random variable, namely one that is set of normal ($\mathbb{R}$-valued) random variables.

Is this correct? Are there some good examples of different types of random measures?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Why didn't you post the link to the Wikipedia article??? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 5, 2014 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry! It is en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_measure $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 5, 2014 at 23:46
  • $\begingroup$ Yes Poisson Random Measure is also a good example, but the only applications of which i know are in the study of Levy processes. $\endgroup$
    – Lost1
    Commented Jan 6, 2014 at 3:25
  • $\begingroup$ I was skimming through "Investigating nonparametric priors with Gibbs structure" (pdf through scholar) which describes the complete random measure, the normalized random measures with independent increments, and generalized gamma processes. I was wondering about applicability versus pure "tour de force" demonstrations by the authors. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 6, 2014 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ The idea of a random measure is that $(S,\Sigma)$ a measurable space where $S$ is a set of measures on some other measurable space, say $(\mathbb R^n,\mathcal B_n)$, i.e. you're randomly selecting a measure on $(\mathbb R^n, \mathcal B_n)$. With counting measure, the values of any $\mu \in S$ are in $\overline{\mathbb N}_0 := \mathbb N\cup\{0,\infty\}$. The idea here is that $\mu(A)$ tells you how many "points" are in $A\subset\mathbb R^n$. Thus, a counting measure defines a scattering of "points" about $\mathbb R^n$. So, a random counting measure models a random scattering of points. $\endgroup$
    – zxmkn
    Commented Sep 24, 2022 at 7:05

2 Answers 2

11
$\begingroup$

As you say, a random measure is a measure-valued RV. You need a sigma algebra structure on the space of measures for this. Often times, the measures will be defined on a separable metric space, and you will be able to use the Prokhorov topology.

An "equivalent" (i.e. "naturally identified") understanding of random measures in the case mentioned above is to say the following: $\alpha: \Omega\times\Sigma\rightarrow [0, 1]$ is a random measure if fixing the left coordinate always gives you a probability measure, and fixing the right coordinate always a measurable map. (See, for instance, Kechris' Classical Descriptive Set Theory Ch. 17)

Random measures are used when talking about regular conditional distributions and exchangeability.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

There are two equivalent definitions of random measure.

Definition 1 (as a random element)

Using words: Given a probability space, a random measure is a measure-valued random element from the sample space to a space of measures where all the measures are defined on the same $\sigma$-field of some measurable space.

Using mathematical symbols: Given a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)$ and a measurable space $(E,\mathcal{E})$, a random measure, $X$, is a measure-valued random element from $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)$ to $(\tilde{M},\tilde{\mathcal{M}})$, where $\tilde{M}$ is the space of all measures on $(E,\mathcal{E})$ and $\tilde{\mathcal{M}}$ is the $\sigma$-algebra over $\tilde{M}$.

Note: $E$ is usually taken as a separable complete metric space and $\mathcal{E}$, as the Borel $\sigma$-algebra over $E$. Further, $\tilde{M}$ is usually taken as the space of all locally finite measures $\mu$ and $\tilde{\mathcal{M}}$, the $\sigma$-algebra over such $\tilde{M}$, generated by the projection maps $\pi_B:\mu \mapsto \mu(B)$ for all $B \in \mathcal{E}$. As to why such choices are made, I quote from the footnote at P-1 of Kallenberg:

"The theory has often been developed under various metric or topological assumptions, although such a structure plays no role, except in the context of weak convergence.

Definition 2 (as a transition kernel)

Using words: Given a probability space and another measurable space, a random measure is a measurable function from the product space of the sample space and the $\sigma$-field of that measurable space to the real line, i.e., a function of two variables, such that if the first variable is fixed (to a particular value), the function becomes a particular measure on that $\sigma$-field and if the second variable is fixed (to a particular set), the function becomes a measurable function on the probability space.

Using mathematical symbols: Given a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)$ and a measurable space $(E,\mathcal{E})$, a random measure, $X$, is a function of two variables, taking values $\{X(\omega,B):\omega \in \Omega, B \in \mathcal{E} \}$, with $X:\Omega \times \mathcal{E} \to \mathbb{\bar{R}}$, such that for a fixed $\omega$, $X$ is a measure on $\mathcal{E}$ and for a fixed $B$, $X$ is $\mathcal{F}$-measurable. (such $X$ is, in fact, called a transition kernel from $\Omega \to E$)

Note: Same note, as above, applies.

Reference

Kallenberg -- Random Measures, Theory and Applications

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .