In discussions about the spectrum of hyperbolic surfaces, people seem to be interested in 'eigenvalues embedded in the continuous spectrum'. I am wondering which definition of the term 'continuous spectrum' is usually meant in this context? The reason I am asking this is because people seem to use different definitions for the term 'continuous spectrum'. Let me list three definitions I know about.
Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space and $T:\mathcal{H}\supset \mathcal{D}(T)\rightarrow\mathcal{H}$ be a densely defined, self-adjoint, and closed operator. Then people refer to the following sets as continuous spectrum:
\begin{align} \sigma_c(T):&=\lbrace{\lambda\in\mathbb{K}: Im(T-\lambda)\neq \overline{Im(T-\lambda)}\rbrace}\\ \sigma_c(T)':&=\lbrace{\lambda\in\mathbb{K}: ker(T-\lambda)=\lbrace{0\rbrace},\,\, Im(T-\lambda)\neq \mathcal{H},\,\,\overline{Im(T-\lambda)}=\mathcal{H}\rbrace}\\ \sigma_c(T)'':&=\sigma_{ess}(T)-\sigma_{p}(T), \end{align} where $\sigma_{ess}(T)$ is the essential spectrum and $\sigma_{p}(T)$ the point spectrum (=set of all eigenvalues).
Moreover, there is also the notion of continuous spectrum coming from the spectral measure associated to $T$. I must admit that I do not understand that definition completely, because I do not know used to work with the spectral measure. I think it corresponds to the union of the 'absolutely continuous spectrum' and the 'singular spectrum', as defined on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decomposition_of_spectrum_(functional_analysis)
I have two questions, which causes me confusion:
1)Which of the above definitions are meant in the context stated at the beginning above?
2) How is the last notion of 'continuous spectrum' related to the other definitions? Is it maybe possible that the continuous spectrum coming from the spectral measure is equal to one of the above ones?
I would very appreciate your help!