I've picked up my old book on Calculus, and going through the introductory examples of the preliminaries, I fail to see my mistake for the following exercise:
Solve the inequality $\frac 3{x-1} < -\frac2x$
In the walkthrough solution in the book, there's a note that we would like to multiply by $x(x-1)$ to clear the fractions in the inequality, but that would require us to consider three cases separately, so instead they transpose and combine the two fractions into a single one:
$$ \frac3{x-1}<-\frac2x\\ \frac3{x-1}+\frac2x<0\\ \frac{5x-2}{x(x-1)}<0 $$
Then goes on to solve the inequality based on the fact that they look for when the numerator and denominator have opposite signs. That is:
CASE I
$5x-2>0$ and $x(x-1)<0$ which gives the interval $\left(\frac25,1\right)$.
CASE II
$5x-2<0$ and $x(x-1) >0$ which gives the interval $(-\infty, 0)$
The solution set is then the union of the two intervals: $$(-\infty,0)\cup\left(\frac25,1\right)$$
Question
I first made an attempt solving this without looking at the walkthrough, and multiplied by $x$ (considering two cases, one for $x<0$ and the other for $x>0$) followed by adding $2$:
CASE I $x<0$
$$ \frac3{x-1}<-\frac2x\\ \frac{3x}{x-1}+2>0\\ 5x-2>0\\ x>\frac25 $$
Not a solution as there is no interval for $x>\frac25$ when $x<0$
CASE I $x>0$
$$ \frac3{x-1}<-\frac2x\\ \frac{3x}{x-1}+2<0\\ 5x-2<0\\ x<\frac25 $$
Gives the interval $(0,\frac25)$.
Well, it is clear I've done something wrong here, but I fail to understand what it is.
I (thought I) was using the rules $$ a < b \,\text{and}\, c > 0 \;\rightarrow\; ac < bc\\ a < b \,\text{and}\, c < 0 \;\rightarrow\; ac > bc $$