1
$\begingroup$

A question has come up on a group project problem for my Calculus II class that I am having a difficult time with.

Here is the question:

"Find a rearrangement of the series $\sum_{i=1}^\infty (-1)^{i+1}/i^2$ that converges to a negative number and provide compelling evidence that the sum is indeed negative.

I'm just not sure how to approach the rearrangement. My partner and I have both tried coming up with a solution, and neither of us can find one.

Riemann's Rearrangement Theorem series says that by changing the order of summation of a conditionally convergent series one can change its value to any real number. Although is there some sort of method that tells you what sort of rearrangement to use? I mean Thomas' Calculus book just basically states the theorem and proves it, and that's it.

Thanks in advance for any help.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Our series is absolutely convergent. All rearrangements give the same sum. So no rearrangement gives a negative sum.

We do not even need to quote the general result. Sooner or later we will have to use the term $1$. From then on, partial sums are certain to be positive.

Remark: Perhaps $\sum_1^\infty (-1)^{i+1}/i$ was intended.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Duh, of course! Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – FofX
    Commented Nov 2, 2014 at 7:40
  • $\begingroup$ Well, that was the first question on that homework, to find a rearrangement of the alt. harmonic series. Now that I look at it, it says "Can you find a rearrangement..." $\endgroup$
    – FofX
    Commented Nov 2, 2014 at 7:45
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome. I have added a more concrete remark for this particular series. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2014 at 7:46
  • $\begingroup$ The alternating harmonic series has denominators $i$, not $i^2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2014 at 7:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yea I know, i was saying the first question on the homework I have was to find a rearrangement of the alt. harmonic series. The second question on my homework was the one you answered, which was the alt. reciprocal squares. $\endgroup$
    – FofX
    Commented Nov 2, 2014 at 8:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .