2
$\begingroup$

Let $y=f(x)$ in Cartesian coordinates. Swapping the $x$ coordinate with the $y$ coordinate has the effect of reflection about the axis $y=x$.

But if $r=f(\theta )$ in polar coordinates (where $r$ is the modulus and $\theta$ is the argument), what happens when we swap $r$ with $\theta$?

For example, what's the difference between the polar graphs of $r=\theta ^2$ and $\theta =r^2$? Do they look the same? Or is there some kind of reflection as well?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ We rectangular coordinates measure the same things in different dimensions so swapping will flip the image. But polar coordinates measure different things angles versus distance. Swapping them would be twisting distance into angles and stretching angles into distance. Simple things like a line segment $\theta = c$ turns into a circle $r= c$. A spiral $r=c\theta$ becomes and scaled spiral $\theta=cr$. $r=\theta^2$ is spiral be that spins a lot at first then bursts out whereas $\theta=r^2$ is a spiral that grows fast at first and then spins fast. $\endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:45

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

The polar plots of $r= \theta^2, \sqrt \theta, \theta$ are shown in blue,red and grey respectively.

The gray line does not reflect red/blue profiles in a way presently imaginable by me.

This is perhaps because $(r,\theta)$ do not have the same physical dimension and belong to a common type or genre.

$Z=r e^{i \theta}$ is a complex number. I do not know what $U = \theta e^{ir}$ really is.

A very good question, but my answer may be is no good. That is indirectly suggested geometric reciprocal requirement is not answered.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by physical dimension? Well, of course, $r=\theta ^2$ is just an example. But I wonder if something can be inferred about all the polar graphs, similar to what can be inferred about all the inverted Cartesian graphs of $y=f(x)$ (i.e. the reflection property). Nevertheless, thanks for your answer with the illustration. $\endgroup$
    – BIRA
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ In Cartesian case,$x,y$ are linear dimension. In Polar case $r,\theta$ have a linear dimension and no dimension (angle is a ratio of lengths) respectively. $\endgroup$
    – Narasimham
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I know what you mean now. But is the graph of $r=\sqrt{\theta}$ the same as the graph of $\theta =r^2$? If we take these as ordered pairs... $\endgroup$
    – BIRA
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, indeed they are same. $\endgroup$
    – Narasimham
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:13
0
$\begingroup$

Polar coordinates we call well known mapping $\mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2$, from $(x,y)$ to $(\theta, r)$ using formulas $x = r\cos \theta$, $y = r\sin \theta$, $r \geqslant 0,\theta \in [0, 2\pi) $.

As to plane $(\theta, r)$, then it is usual cartesian coordinates, usual $\mathbb{R}^2$, and you can think about it exactly as you think about $(x,y)$. $r=\theta^2$ is exactly parabola. $\theta=r^2$ is both branches of square root.

We use polar coordinate, when some function/ curve looks "difficult" for $(x,y)$ and by mapping it to $(\theta, r)$ plane we obtain more "easy" case. Most known example is circle $x^2+y^2=r^2$, which by polar coordinate moves to interval $[0, 2\pi) \times \{1\}$. Disk $x^2+y^2\leqslant r^2$ is mapped to rectangle $[0, 2\pi) \times [0,1]$.

Addition. Now about swapping variables. By definition axial symmetry is not identical Orthogonal Transformation which have line of fixed points. This line is called symmetry axis. To obtain for point $M$ symmetrical point $M'$ with respect to symmetry axis one need to draw perpendicular line to symmetry axis from $M$ and take point $M'$ on this perpendicular on other side of symmetry axis on same distanse as $M$.

For example, if we consider $y=x$ as symmetry axis, then for point $(a,b)$ symmetrical point is $(b,a)$.

So, on $\mathbb{R}^2$ swapping coordinates i.e. having graph $y=f(x)$ and considering $x=f(y)$ is exactly creating symmetry with respect to line $y=x$. Same is, of course if we speak about $r=f(\theta)$ and considering $\theta=f(r)$ - they are symmetric with respect to line $r=\theta$.

Another question is what gives swapping variables for $(x,y)$ in $(\theta, r)$ and reverse. Let's consider firstly "polar plane". As is stated above, swapping variables there means symmetry with respect to line $r=\theta$. Last is well known Archimedean spiral on "cartesian plane". So swapping coordinates $\theta$ and $r$ gives on plane $(x,y)$ graphs "symmetric" with respect to spiral $r=\theta$ which is same as $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=\arctan \frac{y}{x}$. For example parabola $r=\theta^2$, which is some type of spiral on $(x,y)$, after swapping gives $\theta=r^2$, or taking its one branch, $r=\sqrt{\theta}$ is again some spiral on $(x,y)$.

Summing up:

  1. parabola $y=x^2$ is axial symmetric with respect to square root $x=y^2$ using symmetry axis line $y=x$.

  2. In "polar" language spiral $r=\theta^2$ is "spirally" symmetric with respect to spiral $\theta=r^2$ using symmetry "axis" spiral $r=\theta$

Second example. Let's take in polar plane $r=\tan\theta$ i.e. points $(\theta,\tan\theta)$. Swapping variables give $\theta=\tan r$ i.e. points $(\tan r,r)$. Obviously $(\theta,\tan\theta)$ is axially symmetrical to $(\tan r,r)$ with respect to symmetry axis $\theta=r$. Now if we consider corresponding points on $(x,y)$ plane, then symmetry axis $\theta=r$ creates spiral, while $r=\tan\theta$ and $\theta=\tan r$ create some corresponding curves on $(x,y)$: $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=\frac{y}{x}$ and $\arctan \frac{y}{x}=\tan \sqrt{x^2+y^2}$. Obviously $(x,y)$ curves are not axially symmetrical.

If it sounds acceptable, we can call "spirally" symmetrical on plane $(x,y)$ such points, which preimages are axially symmetrical on plane $(\theta, r)$ with respect to symmetry axis $\theta=r$.

Using this term we can call $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=\frac{y}{x}$ and $\arctan \frac{y}{x}=\tan \sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ "spirally" symmetrical on plane $(x,y)$.

$\endgroup$
17
  • $\begingroup$ Name "Polar coordinates" is used for mapping, which is in first paragraph. It is function $\mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2$. First $\mathbb{R}^2$ we imagine as $(x,y)$ plane, second as $(r,\theta)$. But they are only 2 exemplars of one and same object $\mathbb{R}^2$. Practically $\mathbb{R}^2$ is mapped to itself. $\endgroup$
    – zkutch
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:04
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I mised something, but I don't know how that answers the question. The first paragraph is a well-known prerequisite, I would say; the second paragraph is about Cartesian coordinates. And the third paragraph is about how a disk is mapped to a rectangle... $\endgroup$
    – BIRA
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry if there is some misunderstanding, but in you question is sentence "what's the difference between the polar graphs of $r=\theta^2$ and $\theta=r^2$? Do they look the same?" - in second paragraph is answer. May be you mean something other? $\endgroup$
    – zkutch
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:12
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, so do the graphs really look the same? I wasn't sure... $\endgroup$
    – BIRA
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:14
  • $\begingroup$ They are exactly same as $y=x^2$ and $x=y^2$. $\endgroup$
    – zkutch
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 23:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .