In reading the Wikipedia article about the new World Trade Center, 6 WTC is conspicuously absent. It doesn't show up in the navigation sidebar:
And there's no mention of it in the list of planned or built buildings:
Each WTC building has a dedicated article that describes the original building and its replacement, but the article for 6 WTC makes no mention of its history after 9/11.
Someone noted the lack of 6 WTC on the talk page for the 6 WTC article in 2012, and someone else on the talk page for the main WTC article in 2016, but both inquiries went unanswered, and I can't find any mention of a "new" 6 WTC in my Google searches.
Why was 6 WTC never rebuilt, or had plans to be rebuilt?
Edit: since there seems to be random speculation in the comments and answer: 1 WTC, 2 WTC, 3 WTC are arbitrarily designated addresses. They do not indicate the physical location or the tenants that reside within the buildings:
- The new 1 WTC occupies the location of the old 6 WTC
- The new 2 WTC will occupy the location of the old 5 WTC
- The new 3 WTC occupies the space between the old 4 and 5 WTC
- The new 4 WTC is the only building that occupies the same space as the old building with the same name
- The new 5 WTC will occupy the same space as the Bankers Trust building
- The new 7 WTC occupies a portion of the old 7 WTC (the other portion being an extension of Greenwich St.)
As is the case with most office buildings, the tenants have significantly changed in all buildings since 9/11 and the owner of the complex is the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey: there is no obvious reason why 6 WTC would not be rebuilt simply because the previous tenants (New York Customs) would not renew their lease.
This question is specifically about why, given the buildings are numbered in sequential order and there is no significance to their naming other than 1 WTC, 6 WTC was skipped. In other words, why is there is 7 WTC but not a 6 WTC?
It feels like it should be obvious, but please only answer if you have an authoritative answer with a source backing your answer.