User talk:Vortex3427

Archives

Archive 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slender: The Eight Pages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First-person.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Slender: The Eight Pages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 12:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vortex. I'd like to know if you are still interested in reviewing Talk:Taubaté pregnancy hoax/GA1. Skyshiftertalk 20:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry, I'll get on to it soon. — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 21:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Slender: The Eight Pages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Slender: The Eight Pages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 04:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a draft page for Kane Pixels at draft:Kane Pixels has been a work in progress for a while now. When the mainspace page was still a redirect, it had a notice to not directly create an article from it unless moving draft:Kane Pixels to mainspace. I see you have added stuff that I didn’t to your article, so maybe we can merge Kane Pixels to the corresponding draft. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 16:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the creator of the article. The reason why I titled the article “Backrooms” is based on the opening credits for the first video(Which is also in the article’s info box). Yes I realize that the first video is titled “The Backrooms(Found footage” and the playlist is titled “The Backrooms”. However I am going based on the opening title card of the first video and the fact that the other videos in the series only have “Backrooms” in their titles. Example: “Backrooms-The Third Test”, “Backrooms-Informational Video”, “Backrooms-Pitfalls”, “Backrooms-Damage Control” etc… I will admit that Kane makes the naming of his series difficult when he doesn’t stick with one title. To be fair, he probably wasn’t expecting an article to be made about his series. However based on the examples I mentioned earlier, I must insist that the article’s title remains as it is. Key limes (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for explaining your reasoning. — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 04:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xkalponik was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiktok Rizz Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

X (talk) 11:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vortex3427! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! X (talk) 11:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vortex3427. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cancelmoose".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Rooster, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Victoria and Kailis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ling Nam. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Vortex3427! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to reach out after I continue to see you delete vital information about current topics going on. You continue to say that there’s not enough adequate information even though there’s many notable articles about the situation at hand. It is our job to serve the people with facts. Please allow the topic of Tana and Cody to be on the wikipedia page. WestonH233 (talk) 03:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WestonH233: Please be aware that I support Tana and I believe the findings of D'Angelo Wallace, of whom I am a fan. I'm not in any way trying to censor this information, and I believe that it should be included on the page.

If you want to know why I am deleting these additions, please see my reply on Talk:Cody Ko to another editor.

" I am reverting the additions because this talk page discussion has not yet ended. Talk page discussions must run their course for a consensus to emerge on 1) if it should be included and 2) what to write in the page. This is how decisions on Wikipedia work."

The talk page discussion has not yet ended. A paragraph is still being drafted. There are still some people in cautious opposition. Therefore, there's still no consensus, i.e. no decision has yet been come to. We can only add it in after the participants have come to a consensus.

Feel free to reply if you have any questions or concerns, — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 05:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I appreciate the response. I wanna make sure that when pages are being updated they are being done in a timely manner to insure accuracy. I appreciate the thoroughness in which you are going through to make sure everything is accurate. WestonH233 (talk) 06:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]