Skip to main content

All Questions

134 votes
12 answers
37k views

I am an editor for a lousy paper and I found a better algorithm than theirs. Must I share it with them?

I am handling a paper as an associate editor that proposed an algorithm that I find to be weak. In fact, I was able to show that a very simple, brute-force approach actually has a better running time ...
Matilda Martin Santos's user avatar
54 votes
4 answers
14k views

What to do when you notice that a value in your paper is wrong, once it is accepted but before it is published?

8 months ago, I have submitted my paper to the top journal in my field and finally it got accepted. Unfortunately, I have found one wrong table entry (Experiment Section), which is not a logical value ...
Yacine's user avatar
  • 5,266
52 votes
6 answers
114k views

When / how should I ask about a manuscript's status in review?

I have a manuscript that has been in review for 60 days. The journal asks for reviews within four weeks. At what point is it acceptable (and not detrimental) to contact the editor for an update? How ...
Abe's user avatar
  • 3,305
43 votes
6 answers
8k views

Is it common for Chinese nationals to turn down review requests?

I am an associate editor for some international scientific journals. Unsurprisingly, I receive a number of submissions from Chinese scholars (working in China), which go through the standard peer ...
Wonder's user avatar
  • 441
43 votes
3 answers
6k views

How to tell reviewers that I can't update my results

I spent a lot of time during my post-doc doing a big-data analysis using cloud credits paid for by a grant. I got the research conducted, written up, and submitted to a journal. The modeling I did ...
Amadou Kone's user avatar
  • 1,043
42 votes
4 answers
5k views

Published papers with incorrect solutions of famous problems: how to raise concerns with editors?

I recently discovered the following two papers: Bruckman, Paul S. A proof of the Collatz conjecture. Internat. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech. 39 (2008), no. 3, 403–407, DOI: 10.1080/00207390701691574. ...
Nate Eldredge's user avatar
41 votes
2 answers
4k views

How to respond to a perplexing review?

I've received a perplexing peer-review to a submitted paper of mine. The editor asks for major revisions, and sent us two reviews. The first one is serious and raises good points: we'll work, amend ...
F'x's user avatar
  • 73.5k
40 votes
4 answers
11k views

How to deal with an unreasonable reviewer asking to cite irrelevant articles?

Two years ago, when I was doing my master’s degree, I was working on a computational project. My supervisor was well-known in the field and a highly reputed person. We were doing a great job, trying ...
Ramanathan Varadharajan's user avatar
40 votes
6 answers
5k views

Are you permitted to forward the reviews from a rejected manuscript when submitting to a new journal?

Suppose I have a paper rejected from a top tier journal. The anonymous reviews highlight a number of strengths of my paper, but ultimately judge that the paper does not merit publication in that lofty ...
Corvus's user avatar
  • 18.1k
35 votes
8 answers
28k views

Why do editors sometimes accept a paper even if a reviewer recommends rejection?

For the last many days, I have a question in mind related with the editorial decision of accepting or rejecting the manuscript after peer-review: Few days back I got a review report from a very ...
Srijan's user avatar
  • 2,035
31 votes
5 answers
12k views

What happens if the editor cannot find reviewers?

I submitted to a journal a couple of months ago. The editorial flow is somehow quick and very transparent. I receive notifications for all events happening to the manuscript. Unfortunately, the ...
user avatar
26 votes
6 answers
7k views

How can editors and reviewers detect data manipulation?

I am preparing a paper in the field of Computer Science. In order to report test results, we usually run a number of tests and report the average of those tests. For each test, we generate random ...
padawan's user avatar
  • 12.3k
25 votes
4 answers
2k views

As an editor, what measures can I implement to prevent image/photo manipulation?

There's been a case of alleged data manipulation in a recent Nano Letters paper (initial report here; now-retracted paper):      You can surely make your own opinion on whether the images have been ...
F'x's user avatar
  • 73.5k
24 votes
2 answers
5k views

Recommended rejection of a paper, but invited to review the paper again

I was recently asked to review a paper, and ended up recommending a rejection of the paper. The journal has, apparently, asked the authors to revise their paper, and the journal has come back to me ...
adipro's user avatar
  • 8,518
24 votes
3 answers
1k views

When peer reviewers are public/open, are they less likely to be critical of a manuscript?

I have been peer reviewing scholarly manuscripts for more than 10 years, and I am always concerned that the quality of my reviews might be impacted by the fact that my name is made public to authors ...
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
10