SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Presentation for Erasmusplus project LTSDU on PISA 2012 results in Italy

•Download as PPT, PDF•
•
S
sisifo68

Presentation on Italian educational system according to the PISA results 2012 and 2015. The reasons for the failures and the strongpoints of our system.

Related slideshows

Why do gender gaps in education and work persist
Why do gender gaps in education and work persistWhy do gender gaps in education and work persist
Why do gender gaps in education and work persist
 
Pisa 2018 Luxembourg
Pisa 2018 LuxembourgPisa 2018 Luxembourg
Pisa 2018 Luxembourg
 
Achieving Equity and Inclusion in Education: An OECD Perspective
Achieving Equity and Inclusion in Education: An OECD PerspectiveAchieving Equity and Inclusion in Education: An OECD Perspective
Achieving Equity and Inclusion in Education: An OECD Perspective
 
1 of 35
ERASMUS+ PROJECTERASMUS+ PROJECT LET THE SCIENCE DISCOVER USLET THE SCIENCE DISCOVER US March 2017March 2017 San Giovanni Valdarno, ItalySan Giovanni Valdarno, Italy
Presentation for Erasmusplus project LTSDU on PISA 2012 results in Italy
OCSE P.I.S.A. results for ItalyOCSE P.I.S.A. results for Italy PresentedbyIstitutoTecnicoCommercialeStatale"F.Severi" C/oISISValdarno SanGiovanniValdarno Tuscany Italy Officialschoolwebsite
What is PISA? The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an ongoing triennial survey that assesses the extent to which 15- year-olds students near the end of compulsory education have acquired key knowledge and skills that are essential for full participation in modern societies. The assessment does not just
PISA offers insights for education policy and practice, and helps monitor trends in students’ acquisition of knowledge and skills across countries and in different demographic subgroups within each country. The findings allow policy makers around the world to gauge the knowledge and skills of students in their own countries in comparison with those in other countries, set policy targets against measurable goals
PISA countries in the World
Pisa results about SciencePisa results about Science Italy is one the countries with the largest improvement in science performance between 2006 and 2012. Mean science performance among 15-year-olds in Italy however remains below the OECD average. Students in Italy score 494 points in science, on average – below the OECD average, and comparable to the performance of students in Croatia, Denmark France, Hungary, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Spain and the United States. Italy’s mean performance improved by 18 score points between 2006 and 2012, with most of the improvement occurring between 2006 and 2009. © OECD
Stable results Average reading performance among 15-year- olds in Italy is below the OECD average and remained stable between 2000 and 2012. Students in Italy score 490 points in reading, on average – below the OECD average and comparable with Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Israel, Latvia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United States.
Upward trends Between 2000 and 2012 there was no change in Italy’s reading performance; however, after a decline in performance between 2000 and 2003, performance improved to reach the levels observed in 2000. Students in the regions of Veneto, Trento and Lombardia attain 521 score points in reading, well above the OECD average and Italy’s mean score. Girls outperform boys in reading by an average of 39 score points
The share of low-performing students in science (18.7%) is larger than the OECD average but it shrank by 6.6 percentage points between 2006 and 2012. At best, these students can present scientific explanations that are obvious and follow explicitly from given evidence. The share of top-performing students in science (6.1%) is below the OECD average and increased by 1.5 percentage points between 2006 and 2012. Top-performing students can identify, explain and apply scientific knowledge and knowledge about science in a variety of complex life situations. Girls and boys perform at similar levels in science.
Presentation for Erasmusplus project LTSDU on PISA 2012 results in Italy
Pre-primary education makes a difference later on. The percentage of students who report not having attended pre-primary school was 4% in Italy in 2012, compared with an OECD average of 7%. Across OECD countries enrolment in pre-primary education increased between 2003 and 2012, while in Italy it remained stable. In Italy, as in most other countries and economies, disadvantaged students are over-represented among students who reported that they had not attended pre- primary school for more than one year; and students who did not attend pre-primary education are at an increasing disadvantage compared to their peers who did. In Italy as in the Czech Republic, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Luxembourg, the Slovak Republic, Spain and Thailand, the difference in mathematics performance between those 15-year-olds who had attended pre-primary school and those who hadn’t widened by more than 25 points between 2003 and 2012.
Rapporto percentuale tra maschi e femmine
A high-cost of grade repetitionA high-cost of grade repetition In Italy 17% of students reported having repeated a grade at least once, against an OECD average of 12%. Between 2003 and 2012 the proportion of students who reported having repeated a grade at least once increased by 2 percentage points while on average, across OECD countries it declined, particularly in some of the countries with very high levels of grade repetition. For example, France had repetition rates of 39% in 2003, however this proportion declined significantly between 2003 and 2012 and was 28% in 2012. Among students of equal performance in mathematics, socioeconomically disadvantaged students are more likely to having repeated a grade than advantaged students. Requiring that students repeat grades implies some cost, not only the expense of providing an additional year of education but also the cost to society in delaying that student’s entry into the labour market by at least one year. In Italy the cost of grade repetition represents 6.7% of the annual national expenditure on primary- and secondary-school education – or USD 47 174 per repeater.
Is student assessment of teachers reliable? Are studentsIs student assessment of teachers reliable? Are students in the position to judge their teachers fairly?in the position to judge their teachers fairly? “Seeking written feedback from students is associated with better performance and greater equity. In Italy, only 40% of students are in schools whose principal reported that the school seeks written feedback from students regarding lessons, teachers or resources – well below the OECD average of 61%.” This data is to be studied because if such feedback has existed in the past it must have been limited to a very small percentage of schools. It is something very few Italian teachers have ever heard about. This practice is common regulated by the law since last year.
Presentation for Erasmusplus project LTSDU on PISA 2012 results in Italy
Italy improved its performance without sacrificing equity in education. Australia, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Hong Kong-China, Japan, Korea, Liechtenstein and Macao-China achieve high levels of performance and equity in education outcomes. Across OECD countries, 15% of the variation in student performance in mathematics is attributed to differences in students’ socio-economic status. Italy shows above- OECD-average equity in education outcomes, with 10% of the variation in student performance in mathematics attributable to differences in students’ socio-economic status. Across OECD countries, a more socio-economically advantaged student scores 39 points higher in mathematics – the equivalent of nearly one year of schooling – than a less-advantaged student. © OECD
Equity is the keyEquity is the key ITALY – Country Note –Results from PISA 2012 In Italy, a more socio-economically advantaged student scores 30 points higher in mathematics than a less-advantaged student. Of the 39 countries and economies that participated in both PISA 2003 and 2012, Mexico, Turkey and Germany improved both their mathematics performance and their levels of equity in education
Figura S.6. Percentuale di studenti Low e Top performer in Scienze in PISA 2006 e 2015 Fonte: OCSE, Database PISA 2015, Tab. S.8.
Context for student achievementContext for student achievement GDP per capita and spending per student are in line with the OECD average (GDP per capita in Italy is USD 32 110 against an OECD average of USD 33 732 and spending per student is USD 84 416 against an OECD average of USD 83 382). In Italy only 17% of 35-44 year-olds have a tertiary qualification against an OECD average of 34%: this means that 15-year-old students tend to have less educated parents than is the case elsewhere. Italy witnessed major changes in the student population, with an increase of 5 percentage points in the proportion of students with an immigrant background between 2003 and 2012. In Italy 18.4% of students have a very low socio-economic status while on average, across OECD countries this proportion is 15.4%. Many students in Italy are not engaged with school and arrive late, skip classes and days of school thus loosing valuable learning opportunities. Socio-economically disadvantaged students are particularly likely to display low levels of engagement.
Doing more with less moneyDoing more with less money Between 2001 and 2010, expenditure per student grew in most OECD countries. But during the same period, cumulative expenditure on education per student from the age of 6 to 15 shrank by 8% in Italy, with the reduction concentrated towards the very end of that period. Decreases in expenditure during the period were observed only in Italy, Iceland and Mexico. After a certain threshold of cumulative expenditure is reached (roughly USD 50 000), the relationship between spending per student and performance is no longer apparent. Italy and Norway on the other hand have similar levels of performance (485 and 489 points respectively) but very different levels of expenditures (the expenditure in Norway was roughly USD 124 000).© OECD
Scores for Science in 2012
Figura S.7. Distribuzione della performance in Scienze per macro- area geografica
Variations in performance over the last yearsVariations in performance over the last years
Students in the regions of Veneto, Trento andStudents in the regions of Veneto, Trento and Lombardia attain 521 score points in reading,Lombardia attain 521 score points in reading, well above the OECD average and Italy’s mean score.well above the OECD average and Italy’s mean score.
Variations in performance over the last yearsVariations in performance over the last years
Snapshot ofSnapshot of performance inperformance in mathematics, readingmathematics, reading and scienceand science
Disadvantaged studentsDisadvantaged students For disadvantaged students and those who struggle with science, additional resources, targeted either to individual students or to disadvantaged schools, can make a difference in helping students acquire a baseline level of science literacy and develop a lifelong interest in the subject. All students, whether immigrant or non-immigrant, advantaged or disadvantaged, would also benefit from a more limited application of policies that sort students into different programme tracks or schools, particularly if these policies are applied in the earliest years of secondary school.
DisparitiesDisparities These policies often contribute to disparities in the amount and depth of science instruction received by students from different backgrounds. Specific programmes might be needed to spark interest in science among students who may not receive such stimulation outside of school, and to support students’ decision to pursue further studies in science. Giving
• Students in private schools score higher in science than students in public schools; but after accounting for the socio- economic profile of students and schools, students in public schools score higher than students in private schools on average across OECD countries and in 22 education systems. • Standardised tests are used extensively across PISA- participating countries and economies. In about five out of six school systems, at least half of students are assessed at least once a year with mandatory standardised tests, and in about three out of four countries, at least half of students are assessed at least once a year with non-mandatory standardised tests. School governance, assessment and accountabilitySchool governance, assessment and accountability
When choosing a school for their child, parents are more likely to consider important or very important that there is a safe school environment, that the school has a good reputation and that the school has an active and pleasant climate – even more so than the academic achievement of the students in the school.In the majority of countries with comparable data, students’ performance in science remained essentially unchanged since 2006. However, mean performance in science improved between 2006 and 2015 in Colombia, Israel, Macao (China), Portugal, Qatar and Romania. Over this period, Macao (China), Portugal and Qatar increased the share of students performing at or above Level 5 and simultaneously reduced the share of students performing below the baseline level of proficiency (Level 2).
• Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Hong Kong (China) and Macao (China) achieve high levels of performance and equity in education outcomes. • Socio-economically disadvantaged students across OECD countries are almost three times more likely than advantaged students not to attain the baseline level of proficiency in science. But about 29% of disadvantaged students are considered resilient – meaning that they beat the odds and perform at high levels. And in Macao (China) and Viet Nam, students facing the greatest disadvantage on an international scale outperform the most advantaged students in about 20 other PISA-participating countries and economies.
Compensatory measures are often necessary as well as technology as computers, but these have to be used in a way that improves learning, not distracts from it. It is not enough for students in these schools to spend more time studying after school; they also need more time in regular lessons with better teaching, which is what their counterparts in advantaged schools already have. And they need more support after class, too, in the form of tutoring, and in enriching extracurricular activities, especially in countries and economies where students in advantaged schools spend more time studying after school, such as Croatia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Macao (China) and Chinese Taipei. Governments may need to provide additional resources for free-of-charge tutoring in disadvantaged schools so as to prevent the development of a shadow education system – and to ensure equity in education opportunities. Compensatory measuresCompensatory measures
PISA average scores from www.businessinsiders.com Resources from the Web to learn more Useful links PISA results 2015 PISA Results 2012 PISA Results 2012 Italy The Guardian on PISA 2012
➲ "The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi-ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

More Related Content

Presentation for Erasmusplus project LTSDU on PISA 2012 results in Italy

  • 1. ERASMUS+ PROJECTERASMUS+ PROJECT LET THE SCIENCE DISCOVER USLET THE SCIENCE DISCOVER US March 2017March 2017 San Giovanni Valdarno, ItalySan Giovanni Valdarno, Italy
  • 3. OCSE P.I.S.A. results for ItalyOCSE P.I.S.A. results for Italy PresentedbyIstitutoTecnicoCommercialeStatale"F.Severi" C/oISISValdarno SanGiovanniValdarno Tuscany Italy Officialschoolwebsite
  • 4. What is PISA? The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an ongoing triennial survey that assesses the extent to which 15- year-olds students near the end of compulsory education have acquired key knowledge and skills that are essential for full participation in modern societies. The assessment does not just
  • 5. PISA offers insights for education policy and practice, and helps monitor trends in students’ acquisition of knowledge and skills across countries and in different demographic subgroups within each country. The findings allow policy makers around the world to gauge the knowledge and skills of students in their own countries in comparison with those in other countries, set policy targets against measurable goals
  • 6. PISA countries in the World
  • 7. Pisa results about SciencePisa results about Science Italy is one the countries with the largest improvement in science performance between 2006 and 2012. Mean science performance among 15-year-olds in Italy however remains below the OECD average. Students in Italy score 494 points in science, on average – below the OECD average, and comparable to the performance of students in Croatia, Denmark France, Hungary, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Spain and the United States. Italy’s mean performance improved by 18 score points between 2006 and 2012, with most of the improvement occurring between 2006 and 2009. © OECD
  • 8. Stable results Average reading performance among 15-year- olds in Italy is below the OECD average and remained stable between 2000 and 2012. Students in Italy score 490 points in reading, on average – below the OECD average and comparable with Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Israel, Latvia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United States.
  • 9. Upward trends Between 2000 and 2012 there was no change in Italy’s reading performance; however, after a decline in performance between 2000 and 2003, performance improved to reach the levels observed in 2000. Students in the regions of Veneto, Trento and Lombardia attain 521 score points in reading, well above the OECD average and Italy’s mean score. Girls outperform boys in reading by an average of 39 score points
  • 10. The share of low-performing students in science (18.7%) is larger than the OECD average but it shrank by 6.6 percentage points between 2006 and 2012. At best, these students can present scientific explanations that are obvious and follow explicitly from given evidence. The share of top-performing students in science (6.1%) is below the OECD average and increased by 1.5 percentage points between 2006 and 2012. Top-performing students can identify, explain and apply scientific knowledge and knowledge about science in a variety of complex life situations. Girls and boys perform at similar levels in science.
  • 12. Pre-primary education makes a difference later on. The percentage of students who report not having attended pre-primary school was 4% in Italy in 2012, compared with an OECD average of 7%. Across OECD countries enrolment in pre-primary education increased between 2003 and 2012, while in Italy it remained stable. In Italy, as in most other countries and economies, disadvantaged students are over-represented among students who reported that they had not attended pre- primary school for more than one year; and students who did not attend pre-primary education are at an increasing disadvantage compared to their peers who did. In Italy as in the Czech Republic, Finland, Greece, Iceland, Luxembourg, the Slovak Republic, Spain and Thailand, the difference in mathematics performance between those 15-year-olds who had attended pre-primary school and those who hadn’t widened by more than 25 points between 2003 and 2012.
  • 13. Rapporto percentuale tra maschi e femmine
  • 14. A high-cost of grade repetitionA high-cost of grade repetition In Italy 17% of students reported having repeated a grade at least once, against an OECD average of 12%. Between 2003 and 2012 the proportion of students who reported having repeated a grade at least once increased by 2 percentage points while on average, across OECD countries it declined, particularly in some of the countries with very high levels of grade repetition. For example, France had repetition rates of 39% in 2003, however this proportion declined significantly between 2003 and 2012 and was 28% in 2012. Among students of equal performance in mathematics, socioeconomically disadvantaged students are more likely to having repeated a grade than advantaged students. Requiring that students repeat grades implies some cost, not only the expense of providing an additional year of education but also the cost to society in delaying that student’s entry into the labour market by at least one year. In Italy the cost of grade repetition represents 6.7% of the annual national expenditure on primary- and secondary-school education – or USD 47 174 per repeater.
  • 15. Is student assessment of teachers reliable? Are studentsIs student assessment of teachers reliable? Are students in the position to judge their teachers fairly?in the position to judge their teachers fairly? “Seeking written feedback from students is associated with better performance and greater equity. In Italy, only 40% of students are in schools whose principal reported that the school seeks written feedback from students regarding lessons, teachers or resources – well below the OECD average of 61%.” This data is to be studied because if such feedback has existed in the past it must have been limited to a very small percentage of schools. It is something very few Italian teachers have ever heard about. This practice is common regulated by the law since last year.
  • 17. Italy improved its performance without sacrificing equity in education. Australia, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Hong Kong-China, Japan, Korea, Liechtenstein and Macao-China achieve high levels of performance and equity in education outcomes. Across OECD countries, 15% of the variation in student performance in mathematics is attributed to differences in students’ socio-economic status. Italy shows above- OECD-average equity in education outcomes, with 10% of the variation in student performance in mathematics attributable to differences in students’ socio-economic status. Across OECD countries, a more socio-economically advantaged student scores 39 points higher in mathematics – the equivalent of nearly one year of schooling – than a less-advantaged student. © OECD
  • 18. Equity is the keyEquity is the key ITALY – Country Note –Results from PISA 2012 In Italy, a more socio-economically advantaged student scores 30 points higher in mathematics than a less-advantaged student. Of the 39 countries and economies that participated in both PISA 2003 and 2012, Mexico, Turkey and Germany improved both their mathematics performance and their levels of equity in education
  • 19. Figura S.6. Percentuale di studenti Low e Top performer in Scienze in PISA 2006 e 2015 Fonte: OCSE, Database PISA 2015, Tab. S.8.
  • 20. Context for student achievementContext for student achievement GDP per capita and spending per student are in line with the OECD average (GDP per capita in Italy is USD 32 110 against an OECD average of USD 33 732 and spending per student is USD 84 416 against an OECD average of USD 83 382). In Italy only 17% of 35-44 year-olds have a tertiary qualification against an OECD average of 34%: this means that 15-year-old students tend to have less educated parents than is the case elsewhere. Italy witnessed major changes in the student population, with an increase of 5 percentage points in the proportion of students with an immigrant background between 2003 and 2012. In Italy 18.4% of students have a very low socio-economic status while on average, across OECD countries this proportion is 15.4%. Many students in Italy are not engaged with school and arrive late, skip classes and days of school thus loosing valuable learning opportunities. Socio-economically disadvantaged students are particularly likely to display low levels of engagement.
  • 21. Doing more with less moneyDoing more with less money Between 2001 and 2010, expenditure per student grew in most OECD countries. But during the same period, cumulative expenditure on education per student from the age of 6 to 15 shrank by 8% in Italy, with the reduction concentrated towards the very end of that period. Decreases in expenditure during the period were observed only in Italy, Iceland and Mexico. After a certain threshold of cumulative expenditure is reached (roughly USD 50 000), the relationship between spending per student and performance is no longer apparent. Italy and Norway on the other hand have similar levels of performance (485 and 489 points respectively) but very different levels of expenditures (the expenditure in Norway was roughly USD 124 000).© OECD
  • 23. Figura S.7. Distribuzione della performance in Scienze per macro- area geografica
  • 24. Variations in performance over the last yearsVariations in performance over the last years
  • 25. Students in the regions of Veneto, Trento andStudents in the regions of Veneto, Trento and Lombardia attain 521 score points in reading,Lombardia attain 521 score points in reading, well above the OECD average and Italy’s mean score.well above the OECD average and Italy’s mean score.
  • 26. Variations in performance over the last yearsVariations in performance over the last years
  • 27. Snapshot ofSnapshot of performance inperformance in mathematics, readingmathematics, reading and scienceand science
  • 28. Disadvantaged studentsDisadvantaged students For disadvantaged students and those who struggle with science, additional resources, targeted either to individual students or to disadvantaged schools, can make a difference in helping students acquire a baseline level of science literacy and develop a lifelong interest in the subject. All students, whether immigrant or non-immigrant, advantaged or disadvantaged, would also benefit from a more limited application of policies that sort students into different programme tracks or schools, particularly if these policies are applied in the earliest years of secondary school.
  • 29. DisparitiesDisparities These policies often contribute to disparities in the amount and depth of science instruction received by students from different backgrounds. Specific programmes might be needed to spark interest in science among students who may not receive such stimulation outside of school, and to support students’ decision to pursue further studies in science. Giving
  • 30. • Students in private schools score higher in science than students in public schools; but after accounting for the socio- economic profile of students and schools, students in public schools score higher than students in private schools on average across OECD countries and in 22 education systems. • Standardised tests are used extensively across PISA- participating countries and economies. In about five out of six school systems, at least half of students are assessed at least once a year with mandatory standardised tests, and in about three out of four countries, at least half of students are assessed at least once a year with non-mandatory standardised tests. School governance, assessment and accountabilitySchool governance, assessment and accountability
  • 31. When choosing a school for their child, parents are more likely to consider important or very important that there is a safe school environment, that the school has a good reputation and that the school has an active and pleasant climate – even more so than the academic achievement of the students in the school.In the majority of countries with comparable data, students’ performance in science remained essentially unchanged since 2006. However, mean performance in science improved between 2006 and 2015 in Colombia, Israel, Macao (China), Portugal, Qatar and Romania. Over this period, Macao (China), Portugal and Qatar increased the share of students performing at or above Level 5 and simultaneously reduced the share of students performing below the baseline level of proficiency (Level 2).
  • 32. • Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Hong Kong (China) and Macao (China) achieve high levels of performance and equity in education outcomes. • Socio-economically disadvantaged students across OECD countries are almost three times more likely than advantaged students not to attain the baseline level of proficiency in science. But about 29% of disadvantaged students are considered resilient – meaning that they beat the odds and perform at high levels. And in Macao (China) and Viet Nam, students facing the greatest disadvantage on an international scale outperform the most advantaged students in about 20 other PISA-participating countries and economies.
  • 33. Compensatory measures are often necessary as well as technology as computers, but these have to be used in a way that improves learning, not distracts from it. It is not enough for students in these schools to spend more time studying after school; they also need more time in regular lessons with better teaching, which is what their counterparts in advantaged schools already have. And they need more support after class, too, in the form of tutoring, and in enriching extracurricular activities, especially in countries and economies where students in advantaged schools spend more time studying after school, such as Croatia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Macao (China) and Chinese Taipei. Governments may need to provide additional resources for free-of-charge tutoring in disadvantaged schools so as to prevent the development of a shadow education system – and to ensure equity in education opportunities. Compensatory measuresCompensatory measures
  • 34. PISA average scores from www.businessinsiders.com Resources from the Web to learn more Useful links PISA results 2015 PISA Results 2012 PISA Results 2012 Italy The Guardian on PISA 2012
  • 35. ➲ "The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi-ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.